2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic response of plane steel MRF with setbacks: Estimation of inelastic deformation demands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be observed, at low intensities (0.1-0.3 g) the highest drifts are clearly localized in the vicinity of the upper setback, but this tendency changes for increasing intensities, as it can be observed for the cases of 0.6 and 0.7 g, in which the highest drifts occur around the lower setback level and, finally, the lowest levels. This is close to the findings by Karavasilis et al (2008), who report an increasingly marked concentration of damage in the proximities of the setbacks with increasing intensity of ground motion. However, their results do not show the shift observed in the present study, but rather an earlier concentration of higher drifts around the upper setback, with a subsequent concentration in the lower setback as well, but keeping the drift magnitudes at around the same level for both setbacks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As it can be observed, at low intensities (0.1-0.3 g) the highest drifts are clearly localized in the vicinity of the upper setback, but this tendency changes for increasing intensities, as it can be observed for the cases of 0.6 and 0.7 g, in which the highest drifts occur around the lower setback level and, finally, the lowest levels. This is close to the findings by Karavasilis et al (2008), who report an increasingly marked concentration of damage in the proximities of the setbacks with increasing intensity of ground motion. However, their results do not show the shift observed in the present study, but rather an earlier concentration of higher drifts around the upper setback, with a subsequent concentration in the lower setback as well, but keeping the drift magnitudes at around the same level for both setbacks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Even though the results obtained for the trial case study buildings appear to indicate that application of current DDBD procedures to the design of steel moment resisting frames with setbacks can be straight forward, subsequent consideration of the work of Karavasilis et al (2008) leads to believing that a revision of the higher mode reduction factors might be appropriate. In their study, based on results of NLTHAs run on 120 steel frames with setbacks, the authors developed an expression that allows the maximum inter-storey drift to be correlated with the maximum displacement at the top of the frame (i.e.…”
Section: Recommended Modifications To the Higher Mode Reduction Factormentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations