2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01103-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic response of mid-rise steel MRFs: the role of geometrical irregularity, frequency components of near-fault records, and soil-structure interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A six-storey steel frame model considering soil-structure interaction was tested by shake table test and numerically simulated to investigate the effects of different soil types, structural properties and soil-structure interaction which showed that soil-structure interaction effects can noticeably mitigate the dynamic response of structures [13]. Seismic response of mid-rise steel moment-resisting frames considering the role of geometrical irregularity, frequency components of near-fault records, and soil-structure interaction was investigated to indicate the important role of residual frequency component and soil-structure interaction [14]. A novel probabilistic approach to account for soilstructure interaction in the seismic design of building structures was introduced to capture soilstructure effects on the seismic performance of structures by proposing a response modification factor [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A six-storey steel frame model considering soil-structure interaction was tested by shake table test and numerically simulated to investigate the effects of different soil types, structural properties and soil-structure interaction which showed that soil-structure interaction effects can noticeably mitigate the dynamic response of structures [13]. Seismic response of mid-rise steel moment-resisting frames considering the role of geometrical irregularity, frequency components of near-fault records, and soil-structure interaction was investigated to indicate the important role of residual frequency component and soil-structure interaction [14]. A novel probabilistic approach to account for soilstructure interaction in the seismic design of building structures was introduced to capture soilstructure effects on the seismic performance of structures by proposing a response modification factor [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear analysis on efficiency of floor systems showed that response demand was increased under fling-step compared to forward-directivity which leads to more severe damage to buildings [24]. According to an investigation on behavior of the regular and irregular structures subjected to directivity effects, the high-frequency quantity should not be ignored since it may be thought that the resonance phenomenon occurs at TP/T1=1 (the ratio of pulse period to first mode period) [25]. In this situation, designers will have two choices: decomposing NF records to their high-or low-frequency components applying the dominant component based on the TP/T1 value and using the original ground motions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%