1982
DOI: 10.1061/ajgeb6.0001275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response of End-Bearing Piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of bridge-foundation systems such as those of Figure 1 can be computed as the superposition of two effects, as proved by Kausel and Roesset (see also References 9,[27][28][29]: (1) a so-called kinematic interaction effect (sometimes also referred to as 'wave scattering' effect), involving the response to base excitation of a hypothetical system which differs from the complete actual system of Figure 1 in that the mass of the superstructure is set equal to zero; (2) an inertial interaction effect, referring to the response of the complete pile-soil-structure system to excitation by D'Alembert forces,!Mu ( I , associated with the acceleration, u ( I , of the superstructure due to the kinematic interaction. This partition is exact for linear soil, pile, and structure if the analysis in both stages is performed rigorously.…”
Section: Outline Of Methods Of Analysis ¹He Superposition Of Kinematic and Inertial Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of bridge-foundation systems such as those of Figure 1 can be computed as the superposition of two effects, as proved by Kausel and Roesset (see also References 9,[27][28][29]: (1) a so-called kinematic interaction effect (sometimes also referred to as 'wave scattering' effect), involving the response to base excitation of a hypothetical system which differs from the complete actual system of Figure 1 in that the mass of the superstructure is set equal to zero; (2) an inertial interaction effect, referring to the response of the complete pile-soil-structure system to excitation by D'Alembert forces,!Mu ( I , associated with the acceleration, u ( I , of the superstructure due to the kinematic interaction. This partition is exact for linear soil, pile, and structure if the analysis in both stages is performed rigorously.…”
Section: Outline Of Methods Of Analysis ¹He Superposition Of Kinematic and Inertial Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that kinematic interaction effects can be predicted with reasonable accuracy, provided that the soil stiffness profile is evaluated through an equivalent linear viscoelastic analysis. [13][14][15] The filtering of seismic ground motion due to soil-pile interaction has been established using several closed form analytical solutions, 11,[16][17][18][19][20] boundary element formulations 21,22 as well as numerical models. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Studies by Gazetas and Dobry 19 and Kaynia and Kausel 20 showed that the filtering of the free-field motion was stronger in inhomogeneous soil profiles when compared to homogeneous profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that in Winkler models pile-soil interaction is controlled by the key dimensionless parameter (Flores-Berrones and Whitman, 1982;Mylonakis, 1995) λL…”
Section: Static Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that inertial interaction is affected by kinematic interaction as the input motion to the former problem is the output motion of the latter (Kaynia and Kausel, 1982;Mamoon and Banerjee, 1990;Fan et al, 1991;Rovithis et al, 2012). Starting with the pioneering work by Blaney et al (1976), a large number of analytical studies have demonstrated the importance of kinematic effects on piles (Margason, 1975;Flores-Berrones and Whitman, 1982;Dobry and O'Rourke, 1983;Kavvadas and Gazetas, 1993;Mylonakis, 1999Mylonakis, , 2001b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation