2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-011-1104-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic response evaluation of the RC elevated water tank with fluid-structure interaction and earthquake ensemble

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the seismic ground motion duration, large-scale damage occurred to the aqueduct support frame, resulting in a slight deviation from the structure displacement relative to the foundation. (3) Through the analysis of the damage development rule, it discoveries that the failure position of aqueduct structure is mainly focused on the intersection place of pier cap and bent column, and the intersection place of the bent column and the foundation of an aqueduct. It can be seen that the damage at the bottom of the pier cap appears a general down-slope tendency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the end of the seismic ground motion duration, large-scale damage occurred to the aqueduct support frame, resulting in a slight deviation from the structure displacement relative to the foundation. (3) Through the analysis of the damage development rule, it discoveries that the failure position of aqueduct structure is mainly focused on the intersection place of pier cap and bent column, and the intersection place of the bent column and the foundation of an aqueduct. It can be seen that the damage at the bottom of the pier cap appears a general down-slope tendency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many achievements have been made in studying the mechanical properties of aqueducts. Following the existing theory regarding small amplitude water sloshing, fluid-structure interaction between water and structure is usually considered in the previous dynamic analysis of water tanks [1][2][3]. The water tank and aqueduct are similar in structures, so some scholars considered the effect of fluid-structure interaction examined the dynamic failure mechanism of the aqueduct structures under earthquake ground motion [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the impulsive mass is added to the tank mass and the system is reduced to two mechanical degrees of freedom, whereas here it is assumed that the impulsive mass is coupled in a stiffer way to the tank than the sloshing mass. [30][31][32][33][34][35] Thus far, the usage of the Gaussian closure technique is limited either to the SDOF case with the transient response to a time-dependent loading and a dead load 29 or the MDOF case with a symmetric stationary white noise load. 24 Here, the features of the SDOF model will be extended to the MDOF case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shakib et al [13] investigated the filling level of the tank supported by a moment-resisting frame by using FE analysis subjected to horizontal seismic excitations. Their findings indicated that the maximum response does not always occur in the full tank case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%