2012
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2012.681951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic response evaluation of bridges under differential ground motion: a comparison with the new Algerian provisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using eqns (6) and 7the stationary stochastic vector process g t j k n In this paper, we considered a linear dynamic analysis. A finite element model in 3D was created using a finite element code (see Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Ground Motion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using eqns (6) and 7the stationary stochastic vector process g t j k n In this paper, we considered a linear dynamic analysis. A finite element model in 3D was created using a finite element code (see Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Ground Motion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konakli and Der Kiureghian [4,5] presented a simulation of the seismic ground motions by two approaches: The conditional approach where the simulated motion is conditioned by an observed acceleration at a site and the unconditional approach where the ground motion is compatible with an estimated spectral density function The work of Benmansour et al [6][7][8] evaluated the method proposed by the RPOA (the Algerian bridge seismic regulation code) and compared it with more refined approaches and with the provisions of EC8. They have developed a method of generating of asynchronous seismic ground motion in the sense that the displacement signals can be obtained directly without going through the double integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For multi-scale structures like bridges, the spatial variability of seismic ground motion can significantly affect the seismic response generated internal forces. Therefore, the assumption of uniform ground motion at all supports of a multi-scale structure cannot be considered valid [2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the spectral representation method described by Deodatis [19]. Benmansour et al [3] have proposed a technique for simulating spatially variable seismic motions. This method is based on a target earthquake record or an artificial seismic signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%