IntroductionThe design of steel buildings is often governed by lateral wind loads and not seismic loads. Also, statistics indicate that the number of fatalities during earthquakes due to failure of all types of steel buildings is significantly less compared to other types of buildings. Consequently, much effort has been invested to seismically retrofit buildings having unreinforced masonry walls and reinforced concrete frames. However, recently steel buildings have received significant attention, while this interest mainly stems from the realization, following the 1994 Northridge earthquake, that the welded beam-to-column connections in moment-resisting frames were likely to fail in a brittle manner, prior the development of significant inelastic response, therefore negating the design intent and possibility causing safety hazards.Recent research has expanded the variety and versatility of the tools available in the structural engineer's toolbox to meet the seismic performance objectives. This entry provides an overview of how this research is expanding the available options for the seismic strengthening of steel buildings, by reporting on some selected research projects.Structural strengthening and proving seismic resistance for steel building, but also masonry and reinforced concrete, may be done by first considering the direction of the weak links in the structures. For instance, for a heavy building with large dead load, this would be the major factor that contributes to the increase of lateral seismic load. Therefore, it is reasonable to first consider reducing the overall existing dead load and then provide the necessary strengthening technique for the lateral load-resisting system of the structure.The use of structural steel in buildings' retrofitting can be often considered economical and efficient because:• Steel buildings are particularly effective under performance-based design.• Steel members exhibit ductile behavior beyond elastic limit, hence dissipate considerable amount of energy before damages occur.• Steel members have higher strength-to-weight and stiffness-to-weight ratios; hence, the buildings attract less base shear under an earthquake.• A better quality control is practiced in the production of the material as well as the fabrication and erection of them, while ensuring results close to the theoretical predictions.*Email: k.tsavdaridis@leeds.ac.ukEncyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_207-1 # © Crown 2014Page 1 of 26• Steel can be generally used to retrofit all types of structures without increasing the dead weight dramatically, making the works less intrusive and time consuming.
Code-Deficient BuildingsAll buildings can carry their own weight. They can usually carry a bit of snow and a few other floor loads vertically, so even badly built buildings and structures can resist some up-and-down loads. However, buildings and structures are not necessarily resistant to lateral loads, unless this has been taken into account carefully during the structural engin...