1971
DOI: 10.3133/pp605b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic refraction survey of Pleistocene drainage channels in the lower Great Miami River Valley, Ohio

Abstract: Previous investigations.___________ Acknowledgments__-_._____._-_. Field procedures.-____________________ Shothole depths and energy source-. Field-data analysis.-______________ Field problems.__________________ The bedrock surface_________________ Seismic-line designations___________ The buried-valley system.____..__. Proposed Cincinnati well-field area.. Accuracy of depth determinations. .. Comparison of 1962 and 1963 results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The site footprint is approximately 85 ha. Historical site documents indicate that the former refinery is situated in a glacial valley incised into shale bedrock and partially filled with glacial outwash and fluvial deposits (Spieker and Durrell, 1961; Spieker, 1968; Watkins and Spieker, 1971). The fluvio‐glacial aquifer is composed of coarse sediment ranging from approximately 6 to 30 m in thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site footprint is approximately 85 ha. Historical site documents indicate that the former refinery is situated in a glacial valley incised into shale bedrock and partially filled with glacial outwash and fluvial deposits (Spieker and Durrell, 1961; Spieker, 1968; Watkins and Spieker, 1971). The fluvio‐glacial aquifer is composed of coarse sediment ranging from approximately 6 to 30 m in thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been used to map depth to the water table and depth to bedrock in many glacialaquifer reconnaissance studies (Warrick and Winslow, 1960;Gill and others, 1965;Lennox and Carlson, 1967;Watkins and Spieker, 1971;Dickerman and Johnston, 1977;Sharp and others, 1977;Haeni and Anderson, 1980;Mazzaferro, 1980;Fretwell and Stewart, 1981;Grady and Handman, 1983;Tolman and others, 1983;Haeni and Melvin, 1984;Ayers, 1989;Ayotte, 1989;Moore, 1990;Melvin and Bingham, 1991) and in a few simulation studies (Birch, 1976;Haeni, 1978;Morrissey, 1983;Haeni, 1986a;Mazzaferro, 1986;Toppin, 1987;Tepper and others, 1990).…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average porosity of 0.32 was determined from laboratory measurements of bulk and particle mass density on splitspoon borehole samples. The unconsolidated deposits range from 20 to 40 ft (6 to 12 m) in thickness and overlie shale bedrock (Watkins and Spieker, 1968). Figure 2 denote lateral boundaries between the unconfined aquifer and upland surfaces that are underlain by glacial till or shale bedrock (Spieker, 1968).…”
Section: Integrating Gis and Network Designmentioning
confidence: 99%