2014
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20141310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Quantitative Interpretation of a Gas Bearing Reservoir - From Rock Physics to Volumetric

Abstract: A complete well-seismic integration project was successfully performed in a gas field located in the Lower Magdalena Basin, Colombia. The reservoir level corresponds to a laterally limited, mixed clastic turbidte system (laminated, shaly sands) which makes prospect identification and delineation difficult. The study can be divided in three phases: well log analysis, seismic analysis and interpretation/integration. Well log analysis included petrophysical volumetric estimation and rock physics modeling. Seismic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the seismic derived elastic properties (see figure 6) and the RPTs we can identify those zones with highest probabilities of being gas bearing sands. It is important to note that a detailed QC analysis on the seismic inversion and the well-seismic calibration needs to be previously done in order to assure the most reliable result (Alvarez, P., et al, 2014). Figure 7 shows the highlighted geobodies using the log scale RPTs (see black polygon) where a thick gas reservoir in the well B can be easily identified.…”
Section: Upscaled Rock Physics Templates For Seismic Reservoir Characmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the seismic derived elastic properties (see figure 6) and the RPTs we can identify those zones with highest probabilities of being gas bearing sands. It is important to note that a detailed QC analysis on the seismic inversion and the well-seismic calibration needs to be previously done in order to assure the most reliable result (Alvarez, P., et al, 2014). Figure 7 shows the highlighted geobodies using the log scale RPTs (see black polygon) where a thick gas reservoir in the well B can be easily identified.…”
Section: Upscaled Rock Physics Templates For Seismic Reservoir Characmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other well was used as a blind test of the MARS technique. Well-log and seismic gather conditioning followed by a prestack simultaneous seismic inversion were performed in the area (Alvarez et al, 2014), to obtain seismically derived volumes of I P and I S . Figure 8a and 8b shows cross sections through the resultant I P and Poisson's ratio cube along wells A and B, together with its logs of I P and Poisson's ratio upscaled to seismic resolution.…”
Section: Case Study 2: Onshore Colombiamentioning
confidence: 99%