Seismic Engineering 2003
DOI: 10.1115/pvp2003-2097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Proving Test of Eroded Piping: Status of Eroded Piping Component and System Test

Abstract: In FY 2000, a 3-year testing program of eroded piping was initiated with the following objectives: 1) to ascertain the seismic safety margins for eroded piping designed under the current seismic design code, 2) to clarify the elasto-plastic response and ultimate strength of eroded nuclear piping. A series of tests on eroded piping components and eroded piping systems was planned. In this paper, the results of those tests are presented and analyzed, focusing on the influence of the form and the number of thinne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that ratchet strain is difficult to simulate, but the strain range could be simulated precisely by FEM. For evaluating the fatigue evaluation more reasonably, it could be proposed that calculating the strain range by FEM and evaluating the fatigue with NUPEC prediction curve shown in figure 19 [8]. The prediction curve was defined from the pipe and pipe fittings element test results under the hoop stress level was almost 1.0S m [6] [7] [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is known that ratchet strain is difficult to simulate, but the strain range could be simulated precisely by FEM. For evaluating the fatigue evaluation more reasonably, it could be proposed that calculating the strain range by FEM and evaluating the fatigue with NUPEC prediction curve shown in figure 19 [8]. The prediction curve was defined from the pipe and pipe fittings element test results under the hoop stress level was almost 1.0S m [6] [7] [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFDRP by EPRI [4] is well known as successful research in the United States. NUPEC in Japan performed research programs of "Seismic Proving Test of Ultimate Piping Strength" [6], [7] and "Seismic Proving Test of Eroded Piping" [8] in Japan. The authors also investigated about failure behavior of piping under seismic excitation, "Aged Piping (AP) research", in which many shaking table tests and piping element tests were performed [10], [11].…”
Section: Typical Failure Of Elbowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, structural analysis error by difference of geometry between the test specimen and the analysis model includes in this prediction results. Moreover, it was reported that fatigue lives of piping components decrease by tri-axial effect compared to fatigue lives of the material (Namita, 2003). Because there are many factors for error like above, it is difficult to predict the fatigue life of the structure.…”
Section: Prediction Of Fatigue Lifementioning
confidence: 99%