2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Performance of Precast, Pretensioned, and Cast-in-Place Bridges: Shake Table Test Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent any possible slippage, the longitudinal bars of the cage could be partially embedded in the UHPC shell and shared with column concrete which will enhance the bond between the shell and the conventional concrete ( 3 ). Another possible solution for this issue would be the use of the UHPC shell with corrugation in the inner surface similar to the corrugation in socket connections ( 1820 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent any possible slippage, the longitudinal bars of the cage could be partially embedded in the UHPC shell and shared with column concrete which will enhance the bond between the shell and the conventional concrete ( 3 ). Another possible solution for this issue would be the use of the UHPC shell with corrugation in the inner surface similar to the corrugation in socket connections ( 1820 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data collection provided an opportunity to apply machine learning techniques for SHM. A detailed presentation of the system is provided in Thonstad et al 22 ; comparison between the rocking bridge system with conventional concrete bridge system is presented in Mantawy et al 23 ; damage (fracture) identification of longitudinal reinforcement is presented in Mantawy et al 24 ; and numerical modeling calibration for the tested bridge is presented in Mantawy et al 25 Readers are advised to read the abovementioned papers for more insights; however, the following sub‐sections intend to provide necessary background on the tested specimen, ground motions, and identified damages.…”
Section: Rocking Bridge Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents the use of time-series data (accelerations and displacements) collected from highperformance bridge system utilizing pretensioned rocking columns during a shake-table experiment at the University of Nevada, Reno [22][23][24][25] to monitor the health of the bridge during sequential ground motions. To overcome the drawbacks of methods utilizing 1,21 time-series data in training machine learning models especially the small data size, the paper utilizes various techniques to encode time-series data into images to feed the input layer of CNN models which are very effective tools in computer vision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context researchers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] have developed concepts were precast elements are connected via ungrouted tendons and extra elements that work as dampers. The connections are dry, minimizing the on-site construction time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%