2023
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance of a full‐scale five‐story masonry‐infilled RC building subjected to substructured pseudodynamic tests

Abstract: This paper discusses the results of a series of hybrid earthquake tests on a full‐scale reinforced concrete (RC) building with masonry infills. The prototype was a five‐story structure representing the vulnerable part of a typical RC building in Southern Europe, with beams stronger than the columns and masonry infill walls weaker than the surrounding frame elements. The specimen was subjected to a sequence of unidirectional earthquake simulations of increasing intensity up to conditions of significant damage t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The in-plane damage and collapse of masonry infills were recently demonstrated on a full-scale, fivestorey RC building tested under multiple seismic intensities. 2 Moreover, post-earthquake reconnaissance studies echo these results, with the out-of-plane (OOP) collapse of infills, particularly in higher storeys of buildings, often being one of the most significant contributor to building damage, human casualties and economic losses [e.g., in refs. [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The in-plane damage and collapse of masonry infills were recently demonstrated on a full-scale, fivestorey RC building tested under multiple seismic intensities. 2 Moreover, post-earthquake reconnaissance studies echo these results, with the out-of-plane (OOP) collapse of infills, particularly in higher storeys of buildings, often being one of the most significant contributor to building damage, human casualties and economic losses [e.g., in refs. [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%