2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic performance assessment of steel moment-resisting frames with self-centering viscous-hysteretic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental substructures, that is, SC-VDs, are composed of viscous dampers for energy dissipation and springs for self-centering. [49][50][51] The frame design is a two-story four-bay with a floor height of 4 m and a bay length of 9 m. The number of dampers for each story is 10 to maintain appropriate 50% contribution of restoring force, and the displacements are set to be consistent due to rigid diaphragm assumption. Therefore, the total force output of the SC-VDs on the same story can be considered as the measured force of a single damper device multiplied by 10.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental substructures, that is, SC-VDs, are composed of viscous dampers for energy dissipation and springs for self-centering. [49][50][51] The frame design is a two-story four-bay with a floor height of 4 m and a bay length of 9 m. The number of dampers for each story is 10 to maintain appropriate 50% contribution of restoring force, and the displacements are set to be consistent due to rigid diaphragm assumption. Therefore, the total force output of the SC-VDs on the same story can be considered as the measured force of a single damper device multiplied by 10.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that it is very challengeable to quantify the values of β c and β M for SMAFDBs, because the experimental data are very limited . The values given by Zhu et al (2021) may be considered, although the SC braces are different. However, as a comparative analysis, the conclusions obtained in the following sections could remain true if the β c and β M are specified.…”
Section: Fragility Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li and Wang [36] developed the ductility demand spectra for hybrid selfcentering systems with self-centering dampers and viscous dampers. Zhu et al [37] enhanced the seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames using self-centering viscoushysteretic devices. These investigations have confirmed the benefits of viscous dampers in improving the energydissipation capacity and reducing the peak inter-story drift and floor acceleration responses of self-centering systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the outcomes of the existing research [22][23][24][25][35][36][37], this paper proposes hybrid self-centering braced frames equipped with shape memory alloy-based self-centering braces (SMA-SCBs) and viscous dampers for achieving enhanced seismic performance. The major contribution of this paper is to investigate the constant-ductility inelastic displacement ratio of the hybrid self-centering braced frames and to develop a machine learning-driven performancebased seismic design method to achieve the desired maximum inter-story drift responses under considered seismic intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%