2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic isolation of buildings for power stations considering soil-structure interaction effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seismic isolation aims to reduce seismic demand rather than increase the capacity of the structure. A flexible structural system from an earthquake resistance viewpoint is created by matching the fundamental frequencies of base-isolated structures and the predominant frequency contents of earthquakes [23].…”
Section: Principle Of Seismic Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic isolation aims to reduce seismic demand rather than increase the capacity of the structure. A flexible structural system from an earthquake resistance viewpoint is created by matching the fundamental frequencies of base-isolated structures and the predominant frequency contents of earthquakes [23].…”
Section: Principle Of Seismic Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, structural demands should be reduced for the protection of buildings and devices inside, which can be achieved with seismic protective systems. Isolation of structural system from the ground has prominent benefit in terms of protecting structures above the ground [3][4][5][6]. Friction pendulum and rubber bearing are two main types that are used for the isolation of superstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are important objections: (i) the cost is generally excessive, (ii) the architectural and functional impact is important, (iii) the ductility of the structure, due to the fact that in cases of strong excitations, the damage is concentrated on the main elements of the structures (walls, beams and columns) and, (iv) the high weight of the buildings that imply an increase in seismic forces. To address these limitations, two innovative approaches have been proposed: base isolator (Marano and Greco 2003;Yingli et al 2007;Tena-Colunga et al 2009;Liu et al 2011;Bîtcă et al 2015;Tena-Colunga 2015;Hadad et al 2017) and energy dissipator (Restrepo and Rahman 2007;Segués 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%