Seismic inversion with L2,0-norm joint-sparse constraint on multi-trace impedance model

Abstract

Impedance inversion of post-stack seismic data is a key technology in reservoir prediction and characterization. Compared to the common used single-trace impedance inversion, multi-trace impedance simultaneous inversion has many advantages. For example, it can take lateral regularization constraint to improve the lateral stability and resolution. We propose to use the L2,0-norm of multi-trace impedance model as a regularization constraint in multi-trace impedance inversion in this paper. L2,0-norm is a joint-sparse measure, which can not only measure the conventional vertical sparsity with L0-norm in vertical direction, but also measure the lateral continuity with L2-norm in lateral direction. Then, we use a split Bregman iteration strategy to solve the L2,0-norm joint-sparse constrained objective function. Next, we use a 2D numerical model and a real seismic data section to test the efficacy of the proposed method. The results show that the inverted impedance from the L2,0-norm constraint inversion has higher lateral stability and resolution compared to the inverted impedance from the conventional sparse constraint impedance inversion.

Estimation of the Admittance Matrix in Power Systems Under Laplacian and Physical Constraints

“…The (p, 0)-norm of a matrix is obtained from the definition in (1) with r = 0. This norm counts the number of rows in its matrix argument that contain nonzero entries, and hence enforces row-sparsity [22], [58]. Thus, in our case, the constraint of the joint sparsity assumption implies that the matrix [Vec ℓ (G), Vec ℓ ( B)] is a row-sparse matrix, i.e.…”

Physics-informed W-Net GAN for the direct stochastic inversion of fullstack seismic data into facies models

“…This goal is normally achieved by finding the solutions to an ill-posed and highly nonlinear geophysical inverse problem accounting for nonunique solutions, due to noise in the recorded geophysical data and assumed models during data processing 1,[6][7][8] . When fullstack seismic reflection data is inverted, the subsurface acoustic impedance (𝐈 𝐩 ) can be used as the facies-dependent elastic property to model the relationship between facies and observed seismic data (𝐝 𝐨𝐛𝐬 ) domains 7,9 . The prediction of facies from fullstack seismic data can be summarized as follows: synthetic seismic data is calculated from a facies pattern using the colocated 𝐈 𝐏 distribution; the solutions to the inverse problem are the facies patterns that minimize the misfit between synthetic seismic data and 𝐝 𝐨𝐛𝐬 6, [10][11][12] .…”