SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1190/1.3059342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic imaging through gas clouds: A data‐driven imaging strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the hydrocarbon reservoirs or areas of interest are typically located at greater depths within the subsurface, and the recorded data tend to be distorted during the wave propagation through the overburden, particularly in the presence of complex anomalies such as salt or shallow gas clouds. These distortions are due to the strong lateral variation of the velocity in the overburden which then results in strong scattering effects, dispersion, internal multiples, and mode conversion as well as anelastic losses [26]. This is precisely why the Kirchhoff migration approach is typically avoided in the presence of complex geology, as it tends to introduce artifacts in the images, thereby disrupting the interpretation beneath the complex overburden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the hydrocarbon reservoirs or areas of interest are typically located at greater depths within the subsurface, and the recorded data tend to be distorted during the wave propagation through the overburden, particularly in the presence of complex anomalies such as salt or shallow gas clouds. These distortions are due to the strong lateral variation of the velocity in the overburden which then results in strong scattering effects, dispersion, internal multiples, and mode conversion as well as anelastic losses [26]. This is precisely why the Kirchhoff migration approach is typically avoided in the presence of complex geology, as it tends to introduce artifacts in the images, thereby disrupting the interpretation beneath the complex overburden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therewith, seismic redatuming is used to simplify the recorded data and eliminate the overburden effects [26,27] by virtually relocating the acquisition surface beneath the complex geology, simulating the acquisition as if it were conducted at the redatumed level [28]. A seismic redatuming method was primarily used as a straightforward static correction, mainly applied on land seismic data, However, it has emerged as part of subsurface imaging to addressed challenges associated with the complex near surface conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Malaysia, poor subsurface imaging through seismic due to gas seepage is a common problem. Low saturation gas causes reflectivity loss and it can be challenging to interpret hydrocarbon prospects with conventional methodology (Ghazali et al, 2008). Controlled Source Electromagnetic (CSEM) measurements map a different sediment property, namely the electrical property rather than the acoustic (Eidesmo et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%