2016
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggw013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic heating signatures in the Japan Trench subduction plate-boundary fault zone: evidence from a preliminary rock magnetic ‘geothermometer’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of above‐mentioned mineral magnetic properties and SEM/EDS observations provides compelling evidence for the presence of monoclinic pyrrhotite confined to within the three narrow fault zones. In contrast, the plate‐boundary fault zone, which is composed mostly of scaly clays, is dominated by magnetite (see Yang et al, , for details). This difference could be due to the extreme physical/chemical conditions in active plate‐boundary fault zones, compared to the overlying wedge sediment sections (Sutherland et al, ), although further work is required to confirm this explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of above‐mentioned mineral magnetic properties and SEM/EDS observations provides compelling evidence for the presence of monoclinic pyrrhotite confined to within the three narrow fault zones. In contrast, the plate‐boundary fault zone, which is composed mostly of scaly clays, is dominated by magnetite (see Yang et al, , for details). This difference could be due to the extreme physical/chemical conditions in active plate‐boundary fault zones, compared to the overlying wedge sediment sections (Sutherland et al, ), although further work is required to confirm this explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include frictional devolatilization of carbonates and hydrous silicates (e.g., Han et al, ; Rowe et al, ), trace element partitioning (e.g., Tanikawa et al, ), and maturation of organic matter (e.g., Savage et al, ). However, each of these approaches can only be applied under specific conditions, and sometimes detect a certain temperature range only (see Yang et al, , for details). Thus, to achieve a complete picture of frictional heating, yet other approaches are desired, either independent of or working in concert with existing methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This critical value can be higher if we consider a higher pore pressure caused by thermal or thermochemical pressurization, but, at the same time should be lower than 343°C which would correspond to a pore pressure equal to the lithostatic pressure (<15 MPa). In fact, as constrained from various temperature proxies (fission tracks, reaction kinetics, magnetic analysis, and trace elemental and isotopic analyses, as well as Raman spectra, vitrinite reflectance, and biomarkers of carbonaceous materials) [e.g., Mishima et al, 2006;Hirono et al, 2006Hirono et al, , 2015Sakaguchi et al, 2007;Ishikawa et al, 2008;Hamada et al, 2009;Otsuki et al, 2009;Kuo et al, 2011;Savage et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2016], much higher temperatures (>276°C) have been reported for the slip zones associated with the aforementioned earthquakes. Taking the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, for example, where the principal fault slip occurred at 300 m depth in the Chelungpu scientific drilling [Tanaka et al, 2006], magnetic analysis of the slip materials within the core samples indicated that the slip zones have experienced temperatures of at least 400°C Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 10.1002/2016JB013824 [Mishima et al, 2006], which is consistent with the temperatures obtained by using the compositions of major and trace elements (>350°C by Ishikawa et al [2008]), inorganic carbon content (550°C by Hirono et al [2006]), and vitrinite reflectance geothermometry (400-626°C by Maekawa et al [2014]), as well as infrared and Raman spectroscopies (~700°C by Hirono et al [2015]).…”
Section: 1002/2016jb013824mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalous rock magnetic properties, often magnetic enhancement, have been reported in earthquake slip zones, for example, from the Nojima Fault (Japan), which ruptured during the 1995 Kobe Mj 7.3 earthquake (e.g., Enomoto & Zheng, ; Ferré et al, ), the Chelungpu Fault (Taiwan) that hosted the 1999 Mw 7.6 Chi‐Chi earthquake (e.g., Hirono et al, ), and the Yingxiu‐Beichuan Fault (YBF; Sichuan, China) that accommodated the 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake (e.g., Li et al, ; Pei et al, ). Rock magnetic measurements thus have been proposed as a means to locate fault slip (e.g., Chou, Song, Aubourg, Lee, et al, ; Chou, Song, Aubourg, Song, et al, ; Ferré et al, ; Han et al, ; Hirono et al, ; Yang et al, , and references therein) and to constrain the maximum temperature rise caused by the frictional heating (e.g., Chou, Song, Aubourg, Song, et al, ; Hirono et al, ; Mishima et al, ; Yang et al, , ). However, a full appreciation of the rock magnetic approach for earthquake slip diagnosis and concomitant temperature rise requires a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of such magnetic changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%