2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-019-0542-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic fragility of flexible pipeline connections in a base isolated medical building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All other LS are above a PGA = 0.77 g, while the DS1-D is reached at PGA = 0.41 g. This PGA value would be the maximum horizontal PGA that the seismic protection system could experience with a 95% confidence of not exceeding the 5% probability of failure with no damage and linear behavior expected, as required by Design Category 5 (SDC-5) with an LS-D, according to ASCE/SEI-43-05 [21]. Figure 15b shows the results by modifying the pipeline LS (DS1-D mod ) at a limit equal to 224 mm, which represents a moderate damage state (equivalent to damage of broken meshes) [42]. The seismic protection system could perform at 146% of the previously defined maximum PGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other LS are above a PGA = 0.77 g, while the DS1-D is reached at PGA = 0.41 g. This PGA value would be the maximum horizontal PGA that the seismic protection system could experience with a 95% confidence of not exceeding the 5% probability of failure with no damage and linear behavior expected, as required by Design Category 5 (SDC-5) with an LS-D, according to ASCE/SEI-43-05 [21]. Figure 15b shows the results by modifying the pipeline LS (DS1-D mod ) at a limit equal to 224 mm, which represents a moderate damage state (equivalent to damage of broken meshes) [42]. The seismic protection system could perform at 146% of the previously defined maximum PGA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediate functionality reduction for basic events was assumed to be related to loss and cost. Instead of DES or metamodels, a simplified way for waiting time estimation was proposed in Equation (19), where a linear relationship was assumed between the waiting time, the reduction in the number of staffed beds, and the increase in the number of patients. Bias may be introduced in these assessment results.…”
Section: Hybridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functionality of hospitals was highly dependent on physical and human factors after earthquakes, including building damages of structural and nonstructural components, damages of utilities in hospitals and infrastructures outside hospitals, malfunction of medical equipment, emergency management, and staff 17–20 . Recent seismic events have caused serious effects on hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The damage to NSCs can lead to substantial economic losses, both directly and indirectly, often surpassing the costs associated with the primary structural members. The damage to nonstructural components (NSCs), which encompass crucial and valuable equipment, can greatly interrupt the operations of diverse structures, especially vital facilities like airports, hospitals, and sites of historical or cultural significance [2][3]. These results emphasize the critical necessity of assessing the seismic behavior of components alongside structural elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%