Volume 8: Seismic Engineering 2015
DOI: 10.1115/pvp2015-45370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Fragility Assessment of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks

Abstract: A seismic fragility assessment procedure is developed for atmospheric steel liquid storage tanks. Appropriate system and component-level damage states are defined by identifying the failure modes that may occur during a strong ground motion. Special attention is paid to the elephant’s foot buckling failure mode, where the estimation of the associated capacity and demand requires thorough consideration within a probabilistic framework. A novel damage state is introduced to existing procedures with respect to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where P(C|IM � x) is the probability that a ground motion with IM � x will lead to structural collapse, V denotes the standard normal CDF, θ is the median of the fragility function and β is the standard deviation of lnθ. Regarding the selection of IM, the PGA is a valid choice for liquid storage tanks due to the impulsive load pattern [20,33,34].…”
Section: Fragility Function Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P(C|IM � x) is the probability that a ground motion with IM � x will lead to structural collapse, V denotes the standard normal CDF, θ is the median of the fragility function and β is the standard deviation of lnθ. Regarding the selection of IM, the PGA is a valid choice for liquid storage tanks due to the impulsive load pattern [20,33,34].…”
Section: Fragility Function Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rupturing either the bottom layers of the tank wall or the base plate is expected to trigger uncontrolled loss of the stored material, with all the associated consequences considered. Recently, Bakalis et al [16] developed a performance-based assessment methodology for atmospheric steel liquid storage tanks. The PBEE framework considers three damage states of increasing severity, namely minor (DS1), severe without leakage (DS2) and loss of containment (DS3).…”
Section: Performance Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the aforementioned expressions, record-to-record variability can be incorporated explicitly, while limit-state capacity uncertainties can also be included for a structural system that can adequately be approximated by a SDOF oscillator. The aforementioned procedure finds application for the case of liquid storage tanks when a model similar to the one developed by Bakalis et al [15,16] is used. Following a Static Pushover analysis performed on the full tank model, a bilinear idealisation of the system's performance is necessary to obtain the yield point (δy, Vby).…”
Section: Fragility Curves Based On Static Pushover Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8]- [10]) due to their computational simplicity but most disregard the influence of floating roofs. For example, a procedure for estimating the seismic vulnerability of tank farms was introduced in [11]. Although the tanks investigated in [11] were equipped with floating roofs, roof failure modes were neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%