2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic feature extraction using steiner tree methods

Abstract: Identifying "interesting" features, such as faults, unconformities, and other events in subsurface images is a challenging task in seismic data processing. Existing state-of-the-art methods usually involve manual intervention in the form of a visual inspection by an expert, but this is time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone. In this paper, we propose an efficient, automatic approach for seismic feature extraction. The core idea of our approach involves interpreting a given 2D seismic image as a function de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By setting sufficiently high node weights for its terminals, each SPG instance can be reduced to a PCSTP. However, while the number of real-world applications of the classical Steiner tree problem in graphs is limited [13], the PCSTP entails many practical applications, which can be found in various areas, for instance in the design of telecommunication networks [24], electricity planning [6], computational biology [17], or geophysics [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By setting sufficiently high node weights for its terminals, each SPG instance can be reduced to a PCSTP. However, while the number of real-world applications of the classical Steiner tree problem in graphs is limited [13], the PCSTP entails many practical applications, which can be found in various areas, for instance in the design of telecommunication networks [24], electricity planning [6], computational biology [17], or geophysics [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%