2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011gl047151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic evidence of nonlinear crustal deformation during a large slow slip event in Mexico

Abstract: 5p.International audienceRepeated cross-correlations of ambient seismic noise indicate a long-term seismic velocity change associated with the 2006 M7.5 slow-slip event (SSE) in the Guerrero region, Mexico. Because the SSE does not radiate seismic waves, the measured velocity change cannot be associated with the response of superficial soil layers to strong shaking as observed for regular earthquakes. The perturbation observed maximized at periods between 7 s and 17 s, which correspond to surface waves with se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
106
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
17
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum change is approximately 0.2% of the elastic modulus (c.f. 1), which is similar to observations at large scale during slow slip events, 48 earthquakes, 5 or volcanism. 49 The curve in Figure 6 shows a decrease in M with time (/ ¼ 0 is the top of the plot), as well as an increase in the cumulative pump strain.…”
Section: B Nonlinear Response Of a Berea Sandstonesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The maximum change is approximately 0.2% of the elastic modulus (c.f. 1), which is similar to observations at large scale during slow slip events, 48 earthquakes, 5 or volcanism. 49 The curve in Figure 6 shows a decrease in M with time (/ ¼ 0 is the top of the plot), as well as an increase in the cumulative pump strain.…”
Section: B Nonlinear Response Of a Berea Sandstonesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Yet knowledge of the upper crust is not in itself sufficient to characterize seismic hazard, as lower crustal slip beneath the seismogenic zone can drive the seismicity in the upper crust (Tse and Rice, 1986;Scholz, 2002) and lead to the nucleation of large earthquakes (Nadeau and Guilhem, 2009;Shelly, 2009;Segall and Bradley, 2012). Low Frequency Earthquakes (LFEs), which accompany the slow slip events observed on the deep extension of fault interfaces in Cascadia (Rogers and Dragert, 2003;Bostock et al, 2012), Japan (Obara et al, 2004;Shelly et al, 2006), and Mexico (Rivet et al, 2011;Frank et al, 2013), have also been observed in the Parkfield region of California (Nadeau and Dolenc, 2005;Shelly et al, 2009), and present the opportunity to illuminate the elusive elastic and slip behaviors of the lower crust (Rubinstein et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sens-Schonfelder & Wegler 2006;Brenguier et al 2008b;Duputel et al 2009), earthquakes (e.g. Brenguier et al 2008a;Xu & Song 2009;Zaccarelli et al 2011;Minato et al 2012) or slow slip events (SSEs) (Rivet et al 2011). Using the passive monitoring method, Meier et al (2010) detect seasonal velocity changes within the Los Angeles basin (with higher velocities in summer than in winter) and suggest that two possible reasons are hydrological and/or thermoelastic variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%