1979
DOI: 10.1306/2f91890a-16ce-11d7-8645000102c1865d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Evidence for Widespread Possible Gas Hydrate Horizons on Continental Slopes and Rises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a sharp decrease in seismic impedance, the product of compressional wave velocity and bulk density, across the BHSZ, and causes a reflection with reverse polarity with respect to the seafloor, called a bottom simulating reflection (BSR). The BSR is commonly used as a proxy for the presence of gas hydrate (Majumdar et al, 2016;Shipley et al, 1979). Widespread BSRs have been detected along continental margins, assisting the discovery of gas hydrate.…”
Section: Methane Hydrate Stability Zone (Hsz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a sharp decrease in seismic impedance, the product of compressional wave velocity and bulk density, across the BHSZ, and causes a reflection with reverse polarity with respect to the seafloor, called a bottom simulating reflection (BSR). The BSR is commonly used as a proxy for the presence of gas hydrate (Majumdar et al, 2016;Shipley et al, 1979). Widespread BSRs have been detected along continental margins, assisting the discovery of gas hydrate.…”
Section: Methane Hydrate Stability Zone (Hsz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bottom-simulating reflection (BSR), is commonly associated with the presence of gas hydrate under the seafloor. The BSR generally indicates the boundary between free gasbearing sediments below and hydrate-bearing sediments above (Shipley et al 1979;Yamano et al 1982;Singh et al 1993). BSRs can be observed in seismic reflection data due to the acoustic impedance contrast between sediments bearing hydrate and free gas (Kvenvolden 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the basin scale, the thickness of the MHSZ is often determined from in situ pressure and temperature trends with the assumptions that pore water salinity is equal to that of seawater and the influence of pore size may be neglected [e.g., Burwicz et al, 2011;Wallmann et al, 2012]. The resulting MHSZ thicknesses are often in agreement with other indicators of MHSZ thickness, such as bottom-simulating reflections (BSRs) observed on seismic data [e.g., Shipley et al, 1979;Yamano et al, 1982;Foucher et al, 2002;McConnell and Kendall, 2003]. However, local changes in stability conditions can cause the MHSZ thickness to vary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%