2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gl068590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic evidence for tearing in the subducting Indian slab beneath the Andaman arc

Abstract: Segmentation of a subduction zone through tearing is envisaged as an inevitable consequence of the differential rate of slab rollback along the strike of convergent plate boundaries. It is a key feature that controls plate tectonics and seismogenesis in a subduction setting. Globally, lithospheric tears are mostly recognized by seismic tomography and seismicity trends. However, such an intriguing feature has never been imaged with high resolution. Here we present seismological evidence for tearing of the India… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent 2016 strong earthquake ( M w 6.7, depth 60 km) in Manipur area occurred in the wedge part of the Indo‐Burma Ranges also did not cause much damages or casualties [ Gahalaut and Kundu , ]. Kumar et al [] provided the evidence of tearing (offset) in the Indian slab beneath the Burma‐Andaman arc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent 2016 strong earthquake ( M w 6.7, depth 60 km) in Manipur area occurred in the wedge part of the Indo‐Burma Ranges also did not cause much damages or casualties [ Gahalaut and Kundu , ]. Kumar et al [] provided the evidence of tearing (offset) in the Indian slab beneath the Burma‐Andaman arc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our favored model (Figure ) attributes the spatial variation of the observed anisotropy in Areas A and B to a toroidal flow system driven by the slab rollback and modulated by a slab gap between the northward and eastward subducting slabs. Seismic tomography and receiver function investigations have revealed the presence of the slab gap in the vicinity of the EHS at a depth of 200 km (Kumar et al, ; Li et al, ; Xu et al, ). We propose that the trench‐parallel subslab flow escapes from the slab gap and migrates to the mantle wedge beneath Areas A and B, leading to the observed pattern of anisotropy (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orientation groups in the first year are consistent with margin orthogonal extension beneath the Andaman Sea (i.e., mode II megathrust behavior), whereas after that time, the pattern of deformation has reverted to that expected in consequence of relative plate motion, with the Andaman Sea transform faults once again moving as strike‐slip faults and with ~NNW‐SSE stretching across the Andaman Sea spreading centers, as consistent with their geometry and plate‐tectonic significance. Down‐dip slab tears required by the geometry of the subducting slab are consistent with those noted by Kumar et al (). Slab tears enable retreat of individual segments and affect the overriding plate by allowing geodynamic uncoupling of different margin segments, as observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as shown by superposed small circles on Figure , Orientation Group A also defines a ~WSW‐ENE alignment parallel to bottom topography lineations that may reflect left‐lateral strike‐slip on normal faults formed in association with the Andaman Sea spreading centers. The latter alignment is subparallel to a slab tear that joins the Nicobar cusp (Kumar et al, ). Moreover, plotting the gamma factor in association with such an analysis shows that most aftershocks in Orientation Group A were constrictive and likely formed in association with flower structures at the termination of the Seulimeum Fault (cf.…”
Section: Decomposition Of a Complex Scatterplotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation