“…Though much of the current research on anelasticity has been specifically targeted at understanding the cause of midlithospheric discontinuities (MLDs; e.g., Karato et al, 2015;Selway et al, 2015) and at characterizing the nature of the LAB (e.g., Olugboji et al, 2013;Olugboji et al, 2016), the proposed models of anelastic controls on seismic observables can, and indeed should, be applied more broadly when formulating geodynamic interpretations of observed seismic anomalies. Some work has taken anelasticity into account when determining seismic constraints on temperature (e.g., Armitage et al, 2015;Eeken et al, 2018;Goes et al, 2005;Yang & Forsyth, 2008). However, all too frequently seismic velocity anomalies, expressed as percent deviations from an assumed reference model, are only qualitatively interpreted in terms of relative temperatures, with slow (fast) anomalies being translated directly into hot (cold) lithosphere or even asthenosphere.…”