2020
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic evaluation of two‐elevation ceiling system by shake table tests

Abstract: Past earthquakes highlighted the vulnerability of the suspended ceiling, especially in earthquake‐prone countries like Japan; the post‐earthquake reconnaissance showed that damage to ceiling systems led to immeasurable economic loss and disturbance of the timely rescue of casualty. The existing studies have mostly focused on the seismic performance of regular square and leveled ceilings, whereas the inevitable requirements to accommodate air ducts, nonstructural piping, and electrical equipment resulted in a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies, most of which involved shake table tests, have focused on the effects of key parameters on the damage to suspended ceilings, such as peripheral boundary conditions, lateral constraints, joint enhancement, sizes, panel properties, loading directions, and the interaction with other nonstructural elements. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Numerical models of different levels of complexity were also developed to provide insight into the seismic behavior of suspended ceilings. 11,15,18,21,[24][25][26][27] Both the experimental and numerical results have led to a variety of seismic fragility models.…”
Section: Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experimental studies, most of which involved shake table tests, have focused on the effects of key parameters on the damage to suspended ceilings, such as peripheral boundary conditions, lateral constraints, joint enhancement, sizes, panel properties, loading directions, and the interaction with other nonstructural elements. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Numerical models of different levels of complexity were also developed to provide insight into the seismic behavior of suspended ceilings. 11,15,18,21,[24][25][26][27] Both the experimental and numerical results have led to a variety of seismic fragility models.…”
Section: Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Numerical models of different levels of complexity were also developed to provide insight into the seismic behavior of suspended ceilings. 11,15,18,21,[24][25][26][27] Both the experimental and numerical results have led to a variety of seismic fragility models. While the definitions of the damage measures and limit states could be very different, peak floor acceleration (PFA) has been predominantly used as an intensity measure for suspended ceilings.…”
Section: Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 15 shows the statistical parameters (maximum, minimum, and median) of the AAFs of the specimen. e median of the AAF is regarded as the representative value to compare with the code limit [30,31]. Most of the AAFs of B1 are larger than the code limit due to the violent collision at the ceiling perimeter while all AAFs of B2 are smaller than the code limit with the help of seismic clips.…”
Section: Acceleration Amplification Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic testing also allows the assessment of the dynamic properties of the elements (e.g., dynamic identification). Shake table testing represents state‐of‐the‐art dynamic testing (Bianchi et al., 2021; Filiatrault et al., 2004; Ghith et al., 2019; Jun et al., 2020; Kim & Shin, 2021; Lee & Jung, 2020; Luo et al., 2021; Magliulo et al., 2014; Qi et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2015; T. Zhou et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%