1993
DOI: 10.1029/93gl00172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic efficiency of decoupled nuclear explosions

Abstract: Experimental observations of the seismic efficiency of a decoupled nuclear explosion in a salt dome are presented. The energy decoupling factor was calculated from local, regional and teleseismic data using the ratio of the amplitudes of the tamped (well coupled) explosion that had created the cavity and that of the decoupled one. To calculate the amplitudes of the seismic waves of a well coupled explosion of the same yield as the decoupled one, a scaling law for explosions fired within the same region was use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the important conclusions of this study is that the decoupling factors obtained in this study based on both teleseismic and near-field data are smaller than the value estimated by the Russians (Adushkin et al, 1992b). Thus, the coupling is quite strong compared to the coupling estimated for the United States experiments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the important conclusions of this study is that the decoupling factors obtained in this study based on both teleseismic and near-field data are smaller than the value estimated by the Russians (Adushkin et al, 1992b). Thus, the coupling is quite strong compared to the coupling estimated for the United States experiments.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Similarly, for the Sterling event, a decoupling factor of about 705:20 was estimated by Springer et al, (1968). In a recent study, Adushkin et al (1992b) estimated a decoupling factor of 30 for the decoupled event based on the energy calculation consistent with a decoupling factor of 20 based on the amplitude measurements. The energy decoupling factor was calculated as the ratio of actual yield of the decoupled explosion to that of the effective yield estimated on the basis of statistical relationships established for the tamped explosions.…”
Section: Decoupling Factormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But a serious attempts to extend Sharpe's analytical solution beyond that of a spherical cavity was lacking. For this reason, all scaling laws used to date (King et al, 1989;Stevens et al, 1991;Adushkin et al, 1993;Florence and Miller, 1993) to estimate the yield of nuclear explosions from the seismic data are still based on a modification of Sharp. e's solution given by Haskell (1961Haskell ( , 1967.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An event of that type is a so-called decoupled explosion. The FSU detonated several nuclear explosions in large cavities created by tamped (fully coupled) events at Azgir, including a partially decoupled explosion of eight kilotons Oct) in 1976 in an air-filled cavity created by a 64 kt explosion in 1971 [Sykes and Lyubomirskiy,1992;Adushkin et al, 1993].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%