2005
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.45.5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Displacement of a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Wall in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nambu Earthquake

Abstract: Seismic displacement of a geosynthetic-reinforced wall with full-height rigid panel facing (Tanata wall) in the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nambu earthquake is calculated using a pseudo-static method based on a 'multi-wedge' failure mechanism. The calculated value of horizontal displacement of the wall is comparable to the measured one. Based on an investigation into the effect of vertical ground acceleration to the seismic displacement of the wall using vertical and horizontal input ground accelerations in recorded seismo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic equations to evaluate Fd and Fr can be expressed as Eqs. (4) to (6). The value of threshold acceleration against the sliding athres is evaluated as the acceleration when the values of F d and F r become equal to each other (i.e., the factor of safety against sliding becomes unity).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Threshold Acceleration and Moment (Steps 1 And 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic equations to evaluate Fd and Fr can be expressed as Eqs. (4) to (6). The value of threshold acceleration against the sliding athres is evaluated as the acceleration when the values of F d and F r become equal to each other (i.e., the factor of safety against sliding becomes unity).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Threshold Acceleration and Moment (Steps 1 And 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the concept of Newmark's method (NM method) is simple, there have been many studies to adopt the NM method for the evaluation of the earthquake-induced residual displacement of GRS walls (Matsuo et al, 1998;Cai and Barthurst, 1996;Huang and Wang, 2005). However, it should be noted that the sliding or rotating mass and its subsoil are assumed to be rigid in the NM method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tatsuka et al [2], Tatsuka et al [3] results showed very satisfying behavior of these reinforced soil walls compared with walls without reinforcement while facing the earthquake; thus, these walls were developed and used increasingly. [4] Various modeling techniques such as concentrated mass modeling was used to obtain the natural frequency of civil structures such as building structures and fluid storage tanks (Chopra [5]). However, continues mass modeling is suggested to attain more accurate results while modeling structures such as retaining walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%