2001
DOI: 10.1080/13632460109350384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Design Regulation Codes: Contribution of K-Net Data to Site Effect Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…M w has been converted to M JMA for use with the model of Lussou et al [2001] by using Equation 24 of Fukushima [1996]. Ambraseys et al [2005], Boore et al [1997] and Spudich et al [1999] the relation is only compared to data from such sites.…”
Section: Shallow Crustal Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M w has been converted to M JMA for use with the model of Lussou et al [2001] by using Equation 24 of Fukushima [1996]. Ambraseys et al [2005], Boore et al [1997] and Spudich et al [1999] the relation is only compared to data from such sites.…”
Section: Shallow Crustal Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonnefoy-Claudet et al, 2006). Furthermore, when computing empirical ground-motion prediction relations, Lussou et al (2001) showed that, for K-net data, site classification by a combination of Vs30 and H/V predominant period reduced the standard deviation of the computed equation. Zhao et al (2006) classified K-net sites using average H/V response spectral ratios and obtained a relation that well modeled local site effects and also reduced the model's uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5. Compared to the corresponding ranking factors published in Scherbaum et al (2004, see also last column in Table 5 in this publication), only two models present slightly higher LH-values (Lussou et al, 2001;Somerville et al, 2001). However, for the remaining GMMs, Table 5).…”
Section: Ranking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%