The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1139/t11-107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic deformation analysis of Tuttle Creek Dam

Abstract: To facilitate the design of seismic remediation for Tuttle Creek Dam in east central Kansas, a seismic finite difference analysis of the dam was performed using the software FLAC and the UBCSAND and UBCTOT soil constitutive models. The FLAC software has a key advantage because it can use calibrated site-specific constitutive models. Earlier deformation analyses using a hyperbolic constitutive model for the foundation fine-grained materials did not properly represent the modulus and strength reduction and predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average residual strength ratio obtained was 0.11, with no variation seen based on vertical effective stress observed. This result is consistent with the residual strengths measured with a vane in other low plasticity tailings and natural soils (Castro 2003;Stark et al 2012).…”
Section: Laboratory-scale Shear Vanesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The average residual strength ratio obtained was 0.11, with no variation seen based on vertical effective stress observed. This result is consistent with the residual strengths measured with a vane in other low plasticity tailings and natural soils (Castro 2003;Stark et al 2012).…”
Section: Laboratory-scale Shear Vanesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also, the resulting effective stress is slightly lower than the CSRL also explains failure occurring after earthquake shaking ceases. Stark et al (2012) use a value of r u,seismic of 0.7 for assigning a liquefied strength for the seismic retrofit of Tuttle Creek Dam for a number of reasons including the sand FS Liq trend line in Figure 9 becomes asymptotic to unity (1.0) at r u,seismic values greater than or equal to 0.7. In addition, the range of sand trend lines in Figure 9 reach a FS Liq of unity at an r u,seismic of about 0.6, which is in better agreement with the CSRL for the Sand Slope and Sand Toe in Figure 15 and supports assigning a liquefied strength to these two zones.…”
Section: Critical State Line Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for nonsymmetric cyclic loading conditions, the UBCSAND model predicts a less amount of damping compared to the damping of soils observed in laboratory tests [20]. As additional damping, 1% of the critical damping (i.e., damping ratio 0.01) was assigned to the tailings material zones whose constitutive behaviour was represented with the UBCSAND model (see [54,55]). On the other hand, 3% of the critical damping was assigned to the moraine, rockfill, and filter zones where the MC model was utilized (see [54,55]).…”
Section: Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%