The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic crustal structure between the Transylvanian Basin and the Black Sea, Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
70
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
14
70
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The main results of our analysis suggesting a geometry of the southeastern Carpathians lithospheric structure showing alternating high and low velocity zones separated by high-angle thrust faults are in good agreement with the seismic reflection/refraction studies, tomographic inversion analysis and ray-trace modeling (e.g., BOCIN et al, 2005BOCIN et al, , 2009HAUSER et al, 2007;MAT¸ENCO et al, 2010). In addition, our results also suggest the persistence of these complex lateral variations in the mantle domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main results of our analysis suggesting a geometry of the southeastern Carpathians lithospheric structure showing alternating high and low velocity zones separated by high-angle thrust faults are in good agreement with the seismic reflection/refraction studies, tomographic inversion analysis and ray-trace modeling (e.g., BOCIN et al, 2005BOCIN et al, , 2009HAUSER et al, 2007;MAT¸ENCO et al, 2010). In addition, our results also suggest the persistence of these complex lateral variations in the mantle domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The assemblage of vertical faults interpreted on the basis of (near) vertical boundaries within the velocity model obtained by BOCIN et al (2009) closely matches the vertical boundaries obtained in our study. As shown by MERTEN (2010), the locus of postcollisional exhumation corresponds to the position where the basement beneath the nappe pile is in a shallow position (see also LANDES et al, 2004;BOCIN et al, 2005), and is spatially juxtaposed over a shallow Moho configuration (HAUSER et al, 2007). This suggests that post-collisional exhumation is possibly linked to processes taking place at deeper crustal levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is interpreted as foreland-coupling (sensu Ziegler et al, 1995), exhumation related to high-angle reverse faulting in the central part of the orogen being associated with enhanced subsidence in the foreland . This interpretation is supported by the apparently folded, shallow Moho beneath the orogen (Hauser et al, 2007, see Schmid et al, 2008 and their East Carpathians profile in Plate 3). At the regional scale, this was coeval with the Plio-Quaternary inversion recorded in the Pannonian Basin, associated with fault reactivation, large-scale folding and present-day seismicity, generally interpreted as an effect of the push from the Adriatic indenter (e.g.…”
Section: Tectonic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The crustal interpretation is based on the cross section of Schmid et al [2008]. Dashed line at 30-40 km depth represents Moho depth extrapolated from Hauser et al [2007]. Numbers correspond to the six tectonic units described in the text (see Figure 5a [60] The new AFT and AHe data demonstrate that the SE Carpathians are characterized by two postcollisional exhumation stages.…”
Section: Collision Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%