2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic collapse safety and response modification factor of concrete frame buildings reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) rebar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, several studies have examined the application of SMAs in large-scale concrete structures. Siddiquee et al (2021) assessed the seismic performance of 3-, 6-, and 8-story concrete buildings reinforced with Ni-Ti SMA rebar. In this study, they assessed the Collapse Margin Ratio (CMR), which is calculated as the ratio of ground motion intensity at the median collapse point to the ground motion intensity of the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) at the building's fundamental period.…”
Section: Sma Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several studies have examined the application of SMAs in large-scale concrete structures. Siddiquee et al (2021) assessed the seismic performance of 3-, 6-, and 8-story concrete buildings reinforced with Ni-Ti SMA rebar. In this study, they assessed the Collapse Margin Ratio (CMR), which is calculated as the ratio of ground motion intensity at the median collapse point to the ground motion intensity of the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) at the building's fundamental period.…”
Section: Sma Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ni-Ti SMA enables displacement recovery through the shape memory effect, which returns to its original shape above a specific temperature threshold, and the superelastic ability, which returns to its initial state without residual deformation even after surpassing the yield point [21][22][23]. A recent study was conducted to enhance the seismic performance of concrete walls by considering the introduction of SMA bars to replace conventional steel bars in structural members [24][25][26][27]. However, the high production costs associated with SMA bars pose an economic challenge compared to conventional steel bars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some earlier studies employed numerical simulation models to determine the drift capacity of circular RC columns reinforced with SMA bars (Billah & Alam, 2018, 2016a, 2016b; Shrestha & Hao, 2016; Shrestha et al., 2015, 2017). The drift capacity of concrete columns with SMA bars is assessed using numerical simulations (Abraik, 2020; Billah & Alam, 2012; Billah & Alam, 2015; Elfeki & Youssef, 2017; Lee & Jeon, 2022b; Lee et al., 2022; Siddiquee et al., 2021); however, the use of sophisticated finite element models is not incorporated into the current design codes because computing nonlinear numerical simulations is time‐consuming and requires professional knowledge to configure the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%