“…Numerous researchers interpreted that the silicification is of hydrothermal origin (H. H. Chen, Lu, Cao, Han, & Yun, 2016; J. Han, Cao, Qiu, You, & Zhang, 2016; Li et al, 2015, 2017; Lu et al, 2017; Qi, 2016; You et al, 2018; X. Zhu et al, 2016). They proposed that the secondary porosity in the strongly silicified limestone/chert was formed by the silicification which significantly enhanced reservoir properties of the deeply buried carbonates (H. H. Chen et al, 2016; J. Han et al, 2016; Qi, 2016; X. Zhu et al, 2016). The silicification is interpreted to be emplaced during the Silurian‐Devonian (You et al, 2018), the Late Devonian (Lu et al, 2017; Qi, 2016), and the Permian (Li et al, 2015), that is, the silicification was emplaced later than that the carbonates buried to 3,000 m. However, it is not well documented whether the silicification created new secondary pores during deep burial diagenesis (>3,000 m) or the silicified limestone inherits the precursor pores during the silicification.…”