2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic behaviour of Cross-Laminated Timber structures: A state-of-the-art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of 2D finite element models to schematize the in-plane elastic behavior of CLT panels has been demonstrated for both in-plane [22,23] and out-of-plane flexural behavior. In particular, in Franzoni et al [10], an FEM model has been adopted to perform numerical analyses on CLT panels subjected to out-of-plane loads and its effectiveness validated with reference to experiental results, while, in Sturzenbecher et al [14], the results derived from FEM have been compared with theoretical ones.…”
Section: Case Studies and Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of 2D finite element models to schematize the in-plane elastic behavior of CLT panels has been demonstrated for both in-plane [22,23] and out-of-plane flexural behavior. In particular, in Franzoni et al [10], an FEM model has been adopted to perform numerical analyses on CLT panels subjected to out-of-plane loads and its effectiveness validated with reference to experiental results, while, in Sturzenbecher et al [14], the results derived from FEM have been compared with theoretical ones.…”
Section: Case Studies and Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PM mechanical model CLT panels are considered as 2D in-plane stress homogeneous elements (membrane 2D elements) characterized by an elasticlinear orthotropic behavior, [27]. Since the modulus of elasticity of timber parallel to grain is much larger than that perpendicular to grain, the moduli E eq, L and E eq,T in the Longitudinal (L) and Transversal (T) directions are defined according to composite theory [28]…”
Section: The Plane Model -Pmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness in the orthogonal direction to the edge of the floor is assumed equal to zero, since the vertical supporting elements are not in general designed to withstand any lateral load out of their own plane Izzi et al [27]. Mechanical connections at the base are designed only to resist the in-plane racking load CEN [30].…”
Section: The Plane Model -Pmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choice of connection methods for CLT platform systems need to accommodate rocking of wall elements and limit sliding. The most common types of CLT shear wall anchoring connections to date have been hold-down ties and angle brackets capable of resisting uplift and sliding forces, respectively [22]. Initially, when heights and number of storeys of superstructures were limited (circa four or fewer storeys), using anchoring as per LTFS often sufficed.…”
Section: Multi-storey Platform Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%