2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic behaviour and design of steel coupling beams in a hybrid coupled shear wall systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the shear force demand on the links can be calculated as: Step 4: Links can be designed as shear critical in three ways: using larger sections; decreasing link length; or increasing the flange thickness of the built-up I profile. As the first option proves to be rather uneconomical, a new relationship using both the later options was developed based upon W. S. Park and H. D. Yun's research work [12] to ensure greater energy dissipation by keeping the flanges of the coupling links elastic while the web yields in shear. Therefore, built-up I profiles (BuIP) were adopted for the steel links.…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the shear force demand on the links can be calculated as: Step 4: Links can be designed as shear critical in three ways: using larger sections; decreasing link length; or increasing the flange thickness of the built-up I profile. As the first option proves to be rather uneconomical, a new relationship using both the later options was developed based upon W. S. Park and H. D. Yun's research work [12] to ensure greater energy dissipation by keeping the flanges of the coupling links elastic while the web yields in shear. Therefore, built-up I profiles (BuIP) were adopted for the steel links.…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where llink is the link length (from the face of column to the face of RC wall therefore considering eccentricities), θb is the material reduction factor typically taken as 0.9 and the factor 1.35 accounts for the development of strain hardening in the web of the steel coupling link [12]. In determining Zreq, the contribution of the web should be neglected, since it will yield in shear.…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For super high‐rise buildings located in low‐to‐moderate seismic zones, the overall failure or collapse of the building is not quite possible, and the seismic losses are largely induced by the local damages to structural components. Thus, the monitoring and reconstruction of local responses, such as the internal forces and the chord rotation angles, are of equal importance. In this regard, it is desirable to conduct the nonlinear seismic analysis of the building to find out the damage‐sensitive locations and structural components.…”
Section: Osp Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear seismic response of walls coupled with steel and concrete beams was also investigated [4][5][6]; the research demonstrated the advantages of using steel beams to couple reinforced concrete walls. Experiments and simulations have been conducted on the joints of steel CBs and shear walls [7][8][9][10][11], and the results demonstrated that the anchorage has important impacts on the stiffness degradation; the shear yield style steel CB has excellent ductility performance and energy performance, construction convenient, and easy maintenance and replacement, and especially the maintenance can be easily replaced after the earthquake. Wu [12] investigated the steel CB and concrete shear wall joints by employing experiments and finite element analysis, the failure mode of joints, strain distribution, bearing capacity, CB size, concrete strength, ductility, and hysteretic behaviors were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%