2007
DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560801900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and Reservoir Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
328
0
16

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 645 publications
(346 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
328
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of GPR attributes stems from seismic-attribute analysis, a research topic originated in the early 1970s for hydrocarbon exploration. Actually, seismic-attribute analysis is routinely adopted, especially in the oil and gas industry (75). Similarities between the kinematic properties of seismic and GPR data have been well-demonstrated, and the main difference regards the scale of applicability and the physical parameters, such as velocity, frequency, and perturbing field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of GPR attributes stems from seismic-attribute analysis, a research topic originated in the early 1970s for hydrocarbon exploration. Actually, seismic-attribute analysis is routinely adopted, especially in the oil and gas industry (75). Similarities between the kinematic properties of seismic and GPR data have been well-demonstrated, and the main difference regards the scale of applicability and the physical parameters, such as velocity, frequency, and perturbing field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variance calculations are a standard means for such analysis in seismic data sets, especially in time or depth slices [e.g., Chopra and Marfurt, 2007]. The most striking observation is that the center part of the 2-D profile is located in an area of the 3-D P wave data that shows very low variance, compared with the neighboring sections (Figure 15).…”
Section: Profile Protectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, it is generally not possible with conventional seismic reflection to detect lithologic variability within a particular parasequence nor of thin interbeds of strata at the bedset scale. However, more sophisticated seismic-reflection processing and manipulation, such as seismic inversion and seismic-attribute analysis [41] are routinely being used to improve imaging and interpretation of various shalestrata properties. Nevertheless, the geological knowledge that strata at the Parasequence Scale are composed of a specific ductile-brittle stacking pattern provides an indirect indicator for detecting these couplets from seismicreflection records.…”
Section: Seismic Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%