2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-003-2393-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Anisotropy Observations in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California, México

Abstract: A study of seismic anisotropy was performed using data from earthquakes of the Mexicali Valley. The investigated region encompasses the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field (CPGF), one of the most important fields in the world. The results showed that at most of our stations the average polarization directions of the fast S waves range from N14°W to N17°E. A N-S polarization direction was obtained for the whole area by averaging the polarization directions from all stations used. In terms of the EDA hypothesis, this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NE70 yields fast axis direction sub parallel to the trend of the plate boundary, which is consistent with the direction reported for the crust by Zúñiga et al [1995]. González and Munguía [2003] report mean delay times of 0.35s for the crust below Mexicali Valley and Zollo and Bernard [1989] a mean value of 0.25s for the crust of the Imperial Valley, suggesting that the crustal anisotropy in this region may contribute to up to 40% of the delay time obtained with teleseismic waves. The delay time of 0.9s at NE70 indicates that the strain in the vicinity of the Imperial‐Cerro Prieto fault system may not extend deeper than ∼100 km.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…NE70 yields fast axis direction sub parallel to the trend of the plate boundary, which is consistent with the direction reported for the crust by Zúñiga et al [1995]. González and Munguía [2003] report mean delay times of 0.35s for the crust below Mexicali Valley and Zollo and Bernard [1989] a mean value of 0.25s for the crust of the Imperial Valley, suggesting that the crustal anisotropy in this region may contribute to up to 40% of the delay time obtained with teleseismic waves. The delay time of 0.9s at NE70 indicates that the strain in the vicinity of the Imperial‐Cerro Prieto fault system may not extend deeper than ∼100 km.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The ∼7 per cent estimated crack density is similar to values measured near the San Andreas fault at Parkfield (Daley & McEvilly 1990) and a normal fault near Oroville, California (Leary et al 1987), while being somewhat higher than the 5 per cent value measured at the Hector Mine rupture zone (Cochran et al 2003). We also note that 7 per cent is lower than inferred crack density at volcanic or geothermal regions, such as the Long Valley caldera in California (Savage et al 1990), southern Hawaii (Munson et al 1995) and the Cerro Prieto geothermal field in the Mexicali valley, Mexico (González & Munguía 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Thus the characterization of this property provides information about the stress/strain state. Upper crust anisotropy in the GoC region was first characterized in the Mexicali‐Imperial Valley by Zúñiga et al [1995] and González and Munguía [2003], who analyzed the birefringence that affects local S waves. Recently, the installation of broad band stations of the NARS‐Baja and RESBAN arrays have enabled the first studies of the anisotropy of the crust and upper mantle throughout the entire region of GoC using surface waves [ Zhang et al , 2006; Markee and Gaherty , 2006; Zhang et al , 2007] and also SKS waves [ Obrebski et al , 2006; Van Benthem et al , 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%