2014
DOI: 10.1785/0220130061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic and Infrasonic Analysis of the Major Bolide Event of 15 February 2013

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Le Pichon et al () obtained an average yield of 460 kt with a range between 0.1 and 1.4 Mt, based on the empirical period‐yield relation of the infrasound data. In addition, the empirical relation between the explosive yield and M S was also applied to estimate the yield of a bolide (Antolik et al, ). Antolik et al () calculated a Rayleigh‐wave magnitude of M S = 4.06±0.22 and, by assuming a coupling coefficient of 0.001% between the yield and M S , obtained an estimate of approximately 300 kt for the energy released from the bolide blast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Le Pichon et al () obtained an average yield of 460 kt with a range between 0.1 and 1.4 Mt, based on the empirical period‐yield relation of the infrasound data. In addition, the empirical relation between the explosive yield and M S was also applied to estimate the yield of a bolide (Antolik et al, ). Antolik et al () calculated a Rayleigh‐wave magnitude of M S = 4.06±0.22 and, by assuming a coupling coefficient of 0.001% between the yield and M S , obtained an estimate of approximately 300 kt for the energy released from the bolide blast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Heimann et al () investigated the seismic source parameters of the Chelyabinsk event through full waveform fitting based on an isotropic atmospheric airburst model, and Antolik et al () obtained the source mechanism parameters for the explosion based on a full moment tensor solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ens et al (2012) showed that events detected with many stations may have more accurate yields estimated using the dominant period average across all stations, but such averaging is only possible for a limited subset of well observed events. A similar approach has been employed for ground based explosions by the Air Force Technical Applications Centre (AFTAC) which assumes a log normal distribution of periods (Antolik et al, 2014). The root cause of the dispersion in signal periods remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the largest recorded meteor event since the 1908 Tunguska event (Ben-Menahem 1975). The equivalent yield of the explosion was about 500 kt of trinitrotoluene (TNT) (Antolik et al 2014). Many studies focused on the trajectory and speed of the bolide (Borovička et al 2013;Seleznev et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%