1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02648582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segregation of manganese during intercritical annealing of dual phase steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, at the early stage of the α → γ transformation during annealing only with the partitioning of carbon, same as the previous studies with lower intercritical annealing temperatures. 8) As increasing the annealing time, substitutional alloying elements are partitioned between α and γ in order to decrease the total free energy toward the equilibrium states. From these results, it is clarified that the annealed steel under the typical annealing conditions in CAL (annealing temperature: 1 073 K, annealing time: less than 500 s) before cooling is in a metastable state where substitutional alloying elements are not fully partitioned even though the formation of γ during annealing is saturated.…”
Section: α →γ Transformation During Intercritical Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, at the early stage of the α → γ transformation during annealing only with the partitioning of carbon, same as the previous studies with lower intercritical annealing temperatures. 8) As increasing the annealing time, substitutional alloying elements are partitioned between α and γ in order to decrease the total free energy toward the equilibrium states. From these results, it is clarified that the annealed steel under the typical annealing conditions in CAL (annealing temperature: 1 073 K, annealing time: less than 500 s) before cooling is in a metastable state where substitutional alloying elements are not fully partitioned even though the formation of γ during annealing is saturated.…”
Section: α →γ Transformation During Intercritical Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Some studies considered that the partitioning of substitutional alloying elements, such as Mn and Si, was important in the kinetics of the α → γ transformation. 5,6,8,11,12) They had mainly focused on microstructural changes at the annealing conditions with a low range of intercritical temperatures (around 973 K) and long annealing times (more than 1 hour) corresponding to the batch annealing conditions. 8) For example, Pussegoda et al 8) investigated the change in the volume fraction of γ and the Mn partitioning measured by TEM-EDX during annealing at 968 K, and compared the experimental results with a theoretical one-dimensional model developed by Wycliffe et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9][10][11] (3) The phases present in the initial microstructure before heating (ferrite, pearlite, carbides, martensite, and bainite) also influence how the nucleation and growth of austenite takes place. [26,27] In steels with a ferrite + pearlite initial microstructure, similar to the steels studied in this work, austenite formation takes place via two main steps. First, preferential nucleation at the boundaries of pearlite colonies until pearlite is completely transformed to austenite; this is then followed by the ferrite to austenite transformation, which takes place at a much slower rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many studies have revealed that alloying elements are partially partitioned during the intercritical annealing. 28,39,40) In the four-year research project from 2006 to 2009 called "Mathematical Models for Predicting Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Steels" organized by the ISIJ, the partitioning behavior of Mn and Si during annealing at intercritical temperature and its influence on the transformation behavior was studied, and some of the results of this study are introduced here.…”
Section: Model For Predicting Microstructures Of Advanced High-strengmentioning
confidence: 99%