2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of the heart and great vessels in CT images using a model-based adaptation framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
92
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
92
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A first evaluation of the proposed competitive approach was performed on atrial region segmentation in CT images. The obtained results proved the high accuracy of the method, with errors similar to the ones found in other studies in literature (Ecabert et al, 2011;Kirişli et al, 2010;Zheng et al, 2008), particularly for LA ( Figure 9) and aortic tract (Table 3). Indeed, the proposed double-stage segmentation approach (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A first evaluation of the proposed competitive approach was performed on atrial region segmentation in CT images. The obtained results proved the high accuracy of the method, with errors similar to the ones found in other studies in literature (Ecabert et al, 2011;Kirişli et al, 2010;Zheng et al, 2008), particularly for LA ( Figure 9) and aortic tract (Table 3). Indeed, the proposed double-stage segmentation approach (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To the author's best knowledge, no previous work was presented for accurate segmentation of the atrial region with intact mid-thin walls, being a clear novelty of this work. Previous works as (Ecabert et al, 2011) and(Zuluaga et al, 2013) simply merge the different contours (if overlap happens) or prevented gap/vacuum regions, being sub-optimal strategies for clinical evaluation of these thin regions. Although no significant differences are expected between the merged contour strategies and our approach in terms of segmentation evaluation metrics (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations