IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005 2005
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2005.1530293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of prostate boundaries using regional contrast enhancement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm used in the present study to identify the prostate body region is based on the prostate center seeking algorithm presented in [8].…”
Section: Region Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The algorithm used in the present study to identify the prostate body region is based on the prostate center seeking algorithm presented in [8].…”
Section: Region Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods of delineating the prostate, such as those presented in [3,5,7,8], have shown to be successful in segmenting the prostate, however still requiring the input of the doctor to identify the prostate. The present study presents an algorithm of automatically identifying the prostate within the TRUS image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By transforming prostate image into polar space, Zwiggelaar et al segment the prostate by line detection and non-maximum suppression [18]. Sahba et al [19,20] use locally adaptive enhancement [21] and Kalman filter to segment the prostate gland. Rahnamyan et al [22] focus on automated initialization of snakes, whereas Bustince et al [23] use ignorance functions for prostate thresholding.…”
Section: Prostate Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Sahba et al [81] proposed an automated technique that used morphological information [82], a Kalman estimator [83], and fuzzy inference to extract the edges of the prostate. The main limitation of edge detection techniques is that they do not work well with noisy images and/or objects with unclear or diffused edges.…”
Section: A In-vitro Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%