2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation of heterogeneous or small FDG PET positive tissue based on a 3D-locally adaptive random walk algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows that original RW(1) provides better results than the other original RW( β ) methods. The same result was reported in (Onoma et al, ). Our method retains all the properties of the original RW(1) algorithm and, in addition, uses an adaptive parameter to have more robust and user‐independent performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Figure shows that original RW(1) provides better results than the other original RW( β ) methods. The same result was reported in (Onoma et al, ). Our method retains all the properties of the original RW(1) algorithm and, in addition, uses an adaptive parameter to have more robust and user‐independent performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In comparison with the work on PET segmentation of heterogeneous tumor described earlier by various groups, 12,16,33 the present work does not describe elaborate mathematical models. Instead, this work was aimed at being simple and clinically implementable using widely used 3D Slicer software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods range from simple to complex methods. 1,3,4 The segmentation methods include but are not limited to constant and adaptive threshold methods, [5][6][7][8][9] region growing methods, [10][11][12] gradient-based methods, [13][14][15] fuzzy models, [16][17][18] and Gaussian mixture modeling. 10,19 All these methods offer different compromises in terms of versatility and performance and compare well against manual segmentations by clinicians or the pathological measurements with varying rates of success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been also successfully applied to hybrid imaging data, such as PET/CT and PET/MRI [216]. Similarly, random walk approaches have been proven to be effective delineation tools especially over noisy images [216][217][218]. A comparative study of 13 PET segmentation methods over 157 simulated, phantom and clinical PET images was presented in Hatt et al [207]; here, a method built on a convolutional neural network (CNN) was found to be the most accurate.…”
Section: Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%