2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2016.7493497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation label propagation using deep convolutional neural networks and dense conditional random field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interstitial lung disease Anthimopoulos et al (2016) Classification of 2D patches into interstitial lung texture classes using a standard CNN Christodoulidis et al (2017) 2D interstitial pattern classification with CNNs pre-trained with a variety of texture data sets Gao et al (2016c) Propagates manually drawn segmentations using CNN and CRF for more accurate interstitial lung disease reference Gao et al (2016a) AlexNet applied to large parts of 2D CT slices to detect presence of interstitial patterns Gao et al (2016b) Uses regression to predict area covered in 2D slice with a particular interstitial pattern Tarando et al (2016) Combines existing computer-aided diagnosis system and CNN to classify lung texture patterns. van Tulder and de Bruijne (2016) Classification of lung texture and airways using an optimal set of filters derived from DBNs and RBMs Other applications Tajbakhsh et al (2015a) Multi-stream CNN to detect pulmonary embolism from candidates obtained from a tobogganing algorithm Carneiro et al (2016) Predicts 5-year mortality from thick slice CT scans and segmentation masks de Vos et al (2016a) Identifies the slice of interest and determine the distance between CT slices…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interstitial lung disease Anthimopoulos et al (2016) Classification of 2D patches into interstitial lung texture classes using a standard CNN Christodoulidis et al (2017) 2D interstitial pattern classification with CNNs pre-trained with a variety of texture data sets Gao et al (2016c) Propagates manually drawn segmentations using CNN and CRF for more accurate interstitial lung disease reference Gao et al (2016a) AlexNet applied to large parts of 2D CT slices to detect presence of interstitial patterns Gao et al (2016b) Uses regression to predict area covered in 2D slice with a particular interstitial pattern Tarando et al (2016) Combines existing computer-aided diagnosis system and CNN to classify lung texture patterns. van Tulder and de Bruijne (2016) Classification of lung texture and airways using an optimal set of filters derived from DBNs and RBMs Other applications Tajbakhsh et al (2015a) Multi-stream CNN to detect pulmonary embolism from candidates obtained from a tobogganing algorithm Carneiro et al (2016) Predicts 5-year mortality from thick slice CT scans and segmentation masks de Vos et al (2016a) Identifies the slice of interest and determine the distance between CT slices…”
Section: Eyementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, medical imaging datasets are much smaller which hinders the training of convolutional neural networks, due to over-fitting. Nevertheless, deep learning-based methods have been applied to medical imaging for segmentation Gao et al (2016b), detection Navab et al (2015), and classification Gao et al (2016a) tasks by utilizing problem-specific modifications. For example, to predict the pixels in the border region in biomedical image segmentation, the missing context is extrapolated by mirroring the input image Ronneberger et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most similar studies [6,11] targeting the classification of ILD patterns with patch-based CNNs achieved 85.5% and 92.8% classification accuracy, respectively. Binary classification of ILD, non-ILD and healthy (normal) subjects (15 in each group) was performed in [12] using linear regression and texture features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This should be equivalent to the calculation of the metrics in 3D. For comparison with others, we report results for each architecture individually to approximate the performance of the methods in [6] and [11] by the patch-based CNN (Table 1, 1st row) and [10] by the CED (Table 1, 2nd row). Moreover, in order to assess the importance of information fusion, we also retrained the CED without using the probability maps from the patch-based network (Table 1, row 3) using the same 150 slices as in the proposed scheme (Table 1, row 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation