2001
DOI: 10.2108/zsj.18.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation in Annelids: Cellular and Molecular Basis for Metameric Body Plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Goulding [20,80] used a modified naming system based on Conklin’s nomenclature that applied the prefix 4d and superscripts for left/right 4d R /4d L (equal to ML and MR), which were then followed by numbers to denote the further divisions, with 1 being applied to the more animal daughter and 2 applied to the more vegetal daughter. A specific nomenclature exists for 4d sublineages in clitellate annelids, which develop via a modified spiral cleavage program that gives rise to exceptionally large ectodermal and mesodermal stem cells called teloblasts [9,17,62,81,82]. For example, in the leech Helobdella the homolog of 4d, DM" divides bilaterally giving rise to two mesodermal stem cells, the M L and M R teloblasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goulding [20,80] used a modified naming system based on Conklin’s nomenclature that applied the prefix 4d and superscripts for left/right 4d R /4d L (equal to ML and MR), which were then followed by numbers to denote the further divisions, with 1 being applied to the more animal daughter and 2 applied to the more vegetal daughter. A specific nomenclature exists for 4d sublineages in clitellate annelids, which develop via a modified spiral cleavage program that gives rise to exceptionally large ectodermal and mesodermal stem cells called teloblasts [9,17,62,81,82]. For example, in the leech Helobdella the homolog of 4d, DM" divides bilaterally giving rise to two mesodermal stem cells, the M L and M R teloblasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the paraphyly of the polychaetes has implications for the origin of the clitellates. Again segmentation is an issue, with different modes apparently operating in polychaetes versus clitellates (Shimizu & Nakamoto, 2001;Irvine & Seaver, 2006). Also the annelid ancestor clearly underwent indirect development via a trochophore larva ( Fig.…”
Section: The Annelid Ancestormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D) 1999), a reproductive process has evolved which involves the clitellum and the formation of a cocoon in which the embryos are nourished on a supply of yolk and have done away with the requirement for a feeding trochophore larva. Further to this, development via large teloblast cells is employed by the leech and oligochaetes (Weisblat & Huang, 2001;Bergter et al, 2004), and the evolutionary relationship between these leech teloblasts and cells in the posterior growth zone of polychaetes is an important issue to be resolved (de Rosa et al, 2005;Shimizu & Nakamoto, 2001;Seaver et al, 2005). The discussions on the reconstruction of the annelid and clitellate ancestors have been reviewed in greater detail elsewhere (e.g.…”
Section: The Annelid Ancestormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le blastomère 2d a une destinée ectodermique, le second est l'initiale mésodermique. Leur devenir, bien connu sous ses aspects descriptifs chez la Néreis, associé au développement de la larve trocophore, a été analysé de façon fine, jusqu'au plan génétique, chez les clitellates, dont le développement est direct, les hirudinées (achètes) Helobdella stagnalis, Theromyzon rude et tessulatum [17] et l'oligochète Tubifex [18], notamment. Audelà de différences dans les modalités de la gastrulation entre les polychètes et les clitellates, les mouvements et les divisions de ces blastomères conduisent, dans les deux cas, à la mise en place de cellules de grande taille, les téloblastes.…”
Section: Annélides Et Arthropodesunclassified
“…Le maintien des limites segmentaires repose sur des interactions réciproques entre cellules adjacentes via les messagers à rayon d'action local que sont la protéine hedgehog, sécrétée par les cellules exprimant engrailed, et la protéine wingless (Figure 2). Les homologues de hedgehog ont été isolés et leur expression étudiée chez l'hirudiné Helobdella robusta [28], les insectes Schistocerca [18] et Gryllus bimaculatus [29], le myriapode Glomeris marginata [30], le crustacé Artemia salina, le chélicérate Euscorpius flavicaudis [11], les procordés Amphioxus [31] et Ciona [32], ainsi que chez les vertébrés. L'expression précoce, dans beaucoup de cas, a pu être associée à la segmentation, comme elle l'est chez la drosophile.…”
Section: Segmentation Du Corps : Aspects Moléculaires Et Génétiquesunclassified