2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13772-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation Based Noise Variance Estimation from Background MRI Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was found to be the case for all fitting methods and for all three signal models. Clearly, the presence of nonrandom artifacts such as streaking or ghosting requires more sophisticated estimates of noise . In any event, in actual application, the strategy of independent noise estimation is to be preferred over incorporation of yet another parameter into the Bayesian or NLLS analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was found to be the case for all fitting methods and for all three signal models. Clearly, the presence of nonrandom artifacts such as streaking or ghosting requires more sophisticated estimates of noise . In any event, in actual application, the strategy of independent noise estimation is to be preferred over incorporation of yet another parameter into the Bayesian or NLLS analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…random variables with distribution function F X and E X 4 < ∞. Let TX n (s) be defined as in (7), then…”
Section: Asymptoticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [7] improved this estimation with the use of background segmentation, by fitting the density function of the Rayleigh distribution to the histogram of the segmented background in order to estimate the noise variance. The estimation of the noise forms a crucial part in efficiently denoising the MRI as well as in the quality assessment of these images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a small volume, for instance, the presence of partial volume pixels in its boundary could strongly influence the SNR estimation. Hence, a general planar region delineation may not be precise even when applying more complex algorithms such as in Rajan et al [2010], Tsiotsios and Petrou [2013].…”
Section: Planar Region Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%