2015
DOI: 10.1117/12.2083776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation and learning in the quantitative analysis of microscopy images

Abstract: In material science and bio-medical domains the quantity and quality of microscopy images is rapidly increasing and there is a great need to automatically detect, delineate and quantify particles, grains, cells, neurons and other functional "objects" within these images. These are challenging problems for image processing because of the variability in object appearance that inevitably arises in real world image acquisition and analysis. One of the most promising (and practical) ways to address these challenges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To establish the scale for the SEM image, the horizontal field width (HFW) from the SEM image was used. The MAMA software segments particles using a modified “tunable” watershed algorithm, which views the image as one with topographical relief and subsequently segments based on traditional watershedding techniques. The smoothest setting was used for microparticle segmentation. Segmentation enables the quantitative identification of particle attributes, such as particle area and circularity, from SEM images.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To establish the scale for the SEM image, the horizontal field width (HFW) from the SEM image was used. The MAMA software segments particles using a modified “tunable” watershed algorithm, which views the image as one with topographical relief and subsequently segments based on traditional watershedding techniques. The smoothest setting was used for microparticle segmentation. Segmentation enables the quantitative identification of particle attributes, such as particle area and circularity, from SEM images.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that deep conical dimples are inherent in the fracture of very plastic materials. Therefore, the authors assumed that an increase in crack resistance was accompanied by an increase in the depth of the dimples on the fracture surface [27,28]. Figure 9 shows distribution histograms of the visual depth of the dimples for images shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Parameters Of Dimples Of Tearing As An Integral Indicator Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image processing has been an important tool in material/ structural characterization for over three decades (Krakow, 1982;Duval et al, 2014;Robertson et al, 2011;Leach, 2013). Texture analysis (Comer & Delp, 2000)and segmentation (Ruggiero, Ross, & Porter, 2015;Park, Huang, Ji, & Ding, 2013) are few image processing techniques that have been used to address some of the challenges in material characterization. Pre-processing steps like filtering and enhancement techniques (Tomasi & Manduchi, 1998;Angulo & Velasco-Forero, 2013;Buades, Coll, & Morel, 2005) have been used to denoise the image and perform alignment and artifact correction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%