2020 International Workshop on Big Data and Information Security (IWBIS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iwbis50925.2020.9255593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation and Approximation of Blood Volume in Intracranial Hemorrhage Patients Based on Computed Tomography Scan Images Using Deep Learning Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dawud et al only reported the third parameter, “accuracy,” which was 93.48%. 16 The DL model with the highest sensitivity was of Cho et al, 17 followed that of by Irene et al 12…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Dawud et al only reported the third parameter, “accuracy,” which was 93.48%. 16 The DL model with the highest sensitivity was of Cho et al, 17 followed that of by Irene et al 12…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While previous machine learning methods have been used to detect and classify intracranial haemorrhages [36,37], by providing saliency maps highlighting probable regions where blood is distributed [38], these methods do not produce segmentations from which precise blood volumes can be obtained. Quantitative volumetric segmentations have typically been applied to haemorrhagic lesions from traumatic brain injuries, with focus on subdural haematoma, extradural haematoma, and intraparenchymal haemorrhage [39][40][41][42][43]. Less work has attempted the automated segmentation of subarachnoid blood [37], and to our knowledge this work represents the first use of machine learning techniques to segment blood from CT head scans in aneurysmal SAH patients.…”
Section: Interpretation and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their ensemble achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.87 [24]. Irene et al applied a combination of deep learning classification and regression methods to automate the detection, segmentation and volume approximation of ICH, with a system sensitivity and specificity of 0.97 and 0.96, respectively [25]. Kuo et al trained a deep learning algorithm to detect and segment ICH using a dataset consisting of 4,396 NCCTB scans.…”
Section: The Current State Of Machine Learning Applied To Ctb Datamentioning
confidence: 99%