2020
DOI: 10.1177/0033688220925926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmental versus Suprasegmental: Which One is More Important to Teach?

Abstract: This article considers the continuing debate in pronunciation instruction (PI) about whether segmental or suprasegmental features are more important in teaching English to speakers of other languages. While evidence has accumulated on both sides of the debate, the emergence of the notion of English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) further complicates the issue. This article provides a review of current research supporting the different views in the segmental/suprasegmental debate. The review highlights research eviden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Speech can be studied in their fully extension, comprising both segmental and suprasegmental features. Segmental features concern the characteristics of individual phonemes; suprasegmental or prosodic features are transmitted in syllables, utterances, or sentences and consists in, e.g., acoustic emphasis, rhythm, stress or intonation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speech can be studied in their fully extension, comprising both segmental and suprasegmental features. Segmental features concern the characteristics of individual phonemes; suprasegmental or prosodic features are transmitted in syllables, utterances, or sentences and consists in, e.g., acoustic emphasis, rhythm, stress or intonation [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, it is argued that such a path might impede learners from noticing how those elements interact and change meaning overall (Pennington & Rogerson-Revell, 2019). Building on such argument, some scholars suggest that stress patterns should be highlighted based on the comprehension of the interlocutors as they can be held responsible for particular diversions from the intelligibility (Chela-Flores, 2001;Fraser, 2001;Tanner & Landon;2009;Wang, 2020). With regards to the suprasegmental features and their role in intelligibility, there seems to be a low number of studies (Arslan, 2013;Çelik, 1999;Demirezen, 2009;Hişmanoğlu, 2012;Yurtbaşı, 2017) and dissertations (Kılınç & Yıldırım, 2019;Kurt, 2018) conducted in Turkey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some practical suggestions upon how to incorporate suprasegmental features into pronunciation teaching in an EFL context. It has been argued that rather than entangled with prioritizing segmental or suprasegmental features, teachers or prospective teachers should be informed about how they operate and modify meaning in an utterance (Wang, 2020). In this way, Turkish EFL learners of English could be familiarized with the diversions of their use of suprasegmental features and trained towards excelling intelligibility.…”
Section: Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress emphasizes the syllables. Articulation refers to the movement of the teeth, lips, and tongue to change the sound produced (Wang, 2020). When speaking, intonation refers to the rising or falling of a sound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good pronunciation promotes learning, whereas poor pronunciation promotes significant difficulties in language teaching. It includes paying attention to the specific sounds of a language (segments), aspects of speech that go beyond the level of the individual sound, such as intonation, phrasing, stress, timing, and rhythm (suprasegmental aspects), how the voice is projected (voice quality), and, in its broadest definition, paying attention to gestures and expressions that are closely related to how we speak a language (Wang, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%