2021
DOI: 10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-pplfs
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEEKR2: Versatile Multiscale Milestoning Utilizing the OpenMM 7.5 Molecular Dynamics Engine

Abstract: We present SEEKR2 (Simulation-Enabled Estimation of Kinetic Rates Version 2) -the latest iteration in the family of SEEKR programs for using multiscale simulation methods to computationally estimate the kinetics and thermodynamics of molecular processes, in particular, ligand-receptor binding. SEEKR2 generates equivalent, or improved, results compared to the earlier versions of SEEKR, but with significant increases in speed and capabilities. SEEKR2 has also been built with greater ease of usability with extens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study using the MMVT SEEKR approach has predicted the k off of the trypsin–benzamidine complex to be 990 ± 70 s –1 , a value that is relatively closer to the experimental number compared to the previous result of 62 ± 6 s –1 (Table ). However, the fact that a virtually identical simulation scheme can produce results that are more than 1 order of magnitude apart clearly shows the high level of uncertainty involved in the milestoning approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A recent study using the MMVT SEEKR approach has predicted the k off of the trypsin–benzamidine complex to be 990 ± 70 s –1 , a value that is relatively closer to the experimental number compared to the previous result of 62 ± 6 s –1 (Table ). However, the fact that a virtually identical simulation scheme can produce results that are more than 1 order of magnitude apart clearly shows the high level of uncertainty involved in the milestoning approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%