2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking universal detectors for analytical characterizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaporating light-scattering detection (ELSD), first described by Charlesworth [37], is a quasiuniversal detector than can detect any analyte less volatile than the mobile phase [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaporating light-scattering detection (ELSD), first described by Charlesworth [37], is a quasiuniversal detector than can detect any analyte less volatile than the mobile phase [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, the correlation of peak area with fraction amount is positive but may not be linear, and is likely to be a single logarithm or double logarithm on ELSD (Dvořáčková, Šnóblová, & Hrdlička, 2014; Elder, Borman, & Okafo, 2015; Zhang, Kurita, Venkatramani, & Russell, 2019). When sample amount is varied in a limited range, the correlation of peak area with fraction amount can be linearly regressed with an acceptable R 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size was big enough as suggested (> 100) to get a stable result for LTG but not for MHD (Bland, 2004). HPLC-UV was higher than UHPLC-MS/MS for LTG analysis with a mean value of 0.6 mg/L, which could be explained by the co-elution of endogenous impurities attributed to the well-known less specificity of UV detector (Zhang et al, 2019). Quantitative microsphere system LTG immunoassay was applied in the clinical practice and compared with HPLC-UV method in the previous studies (Westley & Morris, 2008;Baldelli et al, 2015a;Morgan et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methods Application and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, isocratic elution by methanol-water was used for separation. The use of potassium dihydrogen phosphate in water (20-100 mM) could increase the intensity and shorten the retention time of three analytes (Additional file 1: Appendix 6) (Greiner-Sosanko et al, 2007;Contin et al, 2010;Rivas et al, 2010;Kimiskidis et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2019). In summary, isocratic elution with methanol to water-50 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate at 39:61 was used for separation, and 210 nm was used for detection to get acceptable peak shape, sensitivity, and run time.…”
Section: Optimization Of Chromatographic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%