Seeking the resilience of service firms: a strategic learning process based on digital platform capability

Abstract

Purpose How to improve the resilience of service firms in the crisis, such as the COVID-19 epidemic, to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage becomes a growing concern worldwide. Digital platform capability (DPC) provides a series of opportunities and advantages for service firms to shape resilience in the crisis. This study aims to clarify the effect and mechanism of DPC on service firms’ resilience, and provides a new mediator (strategic learning [SL]), as well as two boundary conditions (legal inefficiency [LIE] and legal incompleteness [LIC]). Design/methodology/approach Questionnaires were used to obtain firm data, and executives answered these key questions. Data from 293 service firms during the COVID-19 period were used for hypothesis testing. Findings DPC was positively related to the adaptive capacity (AC) and planning capacity (PC) of service firms. SL mediated the positive effect of DPC on the AC and PC of service firms. The positive effect between DPC and SL was weakened when LIE and LIC were high. Practical implications This study suggests that it is a very desirable measure to improve DPC to gain organizational resilience (OR) in the crisis. In addition, a SL process in the crisis is crucial, because service firms need to absorb key strategic information from digital platforms to cope with uncertainty. The services firms need to realize that the benefits of DPC will be weakened in the dysfunctional institutional environment of LIE and LIC. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to link the DPC with the resilience of service firms, and provides a new explanation mechanism and some boundary conditions for this important relationship. Furthermore, this study takes a step forward, because these efforts respond to the widespread call of the literature on digitalization and OR, and provide new insights for understanding digital resilience.

Unveiling the Good and Evil of Organisational Power: An Empirical Study

“…Studies of power relations in private firms point to service firms as a fertile ground for exploration (Handley et al, 2019), as unconventional forms of power resistance such as innovation (Mousavi et al, 2022) change management (Anderson-Gough et al, 2022), and resilience (Liu et al, 2022) have been proven to be success factors of firms itself. Moreover, the dynamics of gender inequality in Italy are to date the subject of much attention by scholars (Alderotti, 2022;Di Castro & Ferri, 2021) who have recognized their relevance for investigation.…”

Filling in the gaps: a service ecosystem perspective on purchase groups as interstitial markets

“…Examples include Pichierri and Petruzzellis' (2022) experimental studies on the effect of employee mask usage on consumer evaluations during different waves of the pandemic and Dahl et al's (2023) pre-and post-lockdown study of consumers' anticipatory value-in-use for digital health services. Similarly, Hwang et al (2022) illustrated how the pandemic exacerbated the impact of customer incivility on frontline service employees, while Liu et al (2023) noted how service firms' digital platform capability improved their resilience over more than a year of dealing with the pandemic. However, there continues to be a paucity of work on "the long-term theoretical and practical implications" stemming from the pandemic in service contexts (Rosenbaum and Russell-Bennett, 2020, p. IV).…”

“…Similarly, Hwang et al. (2022) illustrated how the pandemic exacerbated the impact of customer incivility on frontline service employees, while Liu et al. (2023) noted how service firms’ digital platform capability improved their resilience over more than a year of dealing with the pandemic.…”

Resilience in service firms: the impact of social capital on firm performance during turmoil

“…Huang and Farboudi Jahromi (2021) emphasize the importance of resilience and provide a comprehensive framework focusing on resource-based capabilities. However, empirical research in this area is still scarce and limited to digital capabilities (Fehrer and Bove, 2022;He et al, 2023;Liu et al, 2023) and consumer resilience (Bermes, 2021;Guthrie et al, 2021). Additionally, firm resilience measure is mainly based on surveys, such as the perceived resilience of managers (Neise et al, 2021), adaptive capacity and planning for resilience (Filimonau et al, 2020), organizational performance and employee optimism (He et al, 2023).…”

“…However, empirical research in this area is still scarce and limited to digital capabilities (Fehrer and Bove, 2022; He et al. , 2023; Liu et al. , 2023) and consumer resilience (Bermes, 2021; Guthrie et al.…”