2018
DOI: 10.3233/ch-189201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seeking the optimal hematocrit: May hemorheological modelling provide a solution?

Abstract: Hematocrit increases during exercise and is usually decreased after regular training. However the interpretation of these facts is ambiguous since hematocrit is both a determinant of oxygen supply and the major determinant of blood viscosity. Classically hematocrit was assumed to impair blood flow, but it has been evidenced to exert a biphasic effect on it. In order to cope with these two apparently opposite effects of hematocrit, hemorheologists have proposed the concept hematocrit/viscosity ratio (h/η). This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the sleep variables, both metrics identified hematocrit as the gatekeeper and the most influential node to reach CV. The ‘paradox of hematocrit’ is regularly debated by hemorheologists given its ambiguous aspect for oxygen supply ( Brun et al, 2018 ). During exercise, the enhanced blood oxygen content may be functional when the hematocrit is suboptimal; thus, further circulatory functions should be accounted for the optimized oxygen transport ( Boning et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the sleep variables, both metrics identified hematocrit as the gatekeeper and the most influential node to reach CV. The ‘paradox of hematocrit’ is regularly debated by hemorheologists given its ambiguous aspect for oxygen supply ( Brun et al, 2018 ). During exercise, the enhanced blood oxygen content may be functional when the hematocrit is suboptimal; thus, further circulatory functions should be accounted for the optimized oxygen transport ( Boning et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%